Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 18;14(3):313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030313

Table 1.

Capture rates and trap performance for the different mosquito species sampled in 2016.

Traps Human bait (calf tests)
% % biting Mean (SE) biting rate/10 min Reduction ANOVA Statistics
Mosquito species captures attempts Control Treated Rate (%) F(1,294) p value
Ochlerotatus caspius 82.76 51.39 7.68 (0.92) 1.97 (0.54) 74 28.7 <0.00001
Anopheles hyrcanus 8.73 35.27 3.44 (1.54) 1.87 (0.89) 46 0.4 0.37
Aedes vexans 4.76 2.05 0.57 (0.07) 0.03 (0.04) 94 38.7 <0.00001
Culex pipiens 1.99 0.23 0.03 (0.01) 0.01 (0.01) 67 1.57 0.21
Oc. detritus/coluzzii 1.40 6.77 1.86 (0.19) 0.03 (0.11) 98 70.8 <0.00001
Culex modestus 0.14 4.16 0.44 (0.41) 0.22 (0.24) 50 0.22 0.64
Culiseta annulata 0.06 0.03 0.017 (0.01) 0 100 6.05 0.014
Aedes albopictus 0.01 0.07 0 0.007 (0.01) 0.5 0.48
Anopheles maculipennis 0.14
Coquillettidia richiardii 0.03 0.017 (0.01) 0 100 6.06 0.014
Total 299,408 3051 14.06 (1.16) 4.15 (1.99) 70.5% 18.46 0.00002