Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;14:40. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0495-x

Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression models of the association between cultural participation, educational level and income on superfoods consumption

Spelt products (N = 2759) Quinoa (N = 2737) Goji berries, chia seeds or wheatgrass (N = 2746)
Crude modela Adjusted modelb Crude modela Adjusted modelb Crude modela Adjusted modelb
Variables Categories OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Cultural participation (quintiles) 1 lowest 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1.54 (1.16, 2.05) 1.39 (1.04, 1.87) 1.64 (1.06, 2.55) 1.40 (.89, 2.22) 1.53 (1.03, 2.29) 1.49 (.98, 2.25)
3 1.99 (1.48, 2.67) 1.72 (1.25, 2.35) 2.68 (1.72, 4.16) 2.08 (1.29, 3.35) 1.59 (1.07, 2.36) 1.55 (1.01, 2.36)
4 3.06 (2.26, 4.15) 2.54 (1.83, 3.52) 4.09 (2.64, 6.34) 2.94 (1.83, 4.72) 2.04 (1.37, 3.04) 1.98 (1.28, 3.05)
5 highest 3.72 (2.72, 5.08) 2.97 (2.10, 4.18) 5.37 (3.41, 8.47) 3.50 (2.12, 5.79) 2.83 (1.89, 4.22) 2.69 (1.73, 4.17)
Educational level Primary 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lower secondary 2.15 (1.23, 3.76) 1.78 (1.00, 3.16) 1.13 (.46, 2.81) .91 (.36, 2.33) 1.19 (.56, 2.53) 1.10 (.51, 2.40)
Upper secondary 2.58 (1.46, 4.54) 1.87 (1.04, 3.37) 2.12 (.88, 5.11) 1.45 (.58, 3.63) 1.79 (.85, 3.76) 1.50 (.69, 3.27)
Tertiary 4.36 (2.49, 7.63) 2.55 (1.41, 4.62) 4.70 (1.97, 11.25) 2.37 (.93, 6.02) 2.08 (1.00, 4.32) 1.50 (.68, 3.32)
Household equivalent income <€1000 1 1 1 1 1 1
€1000–€1500 1.20 (.85, 1.69) 1.02 (.71, 1.45) .84 (.53, 1.33) .71 (.44, 1.15) .82 (.51, 1.31) .73 (.44, 1.20)
€1500–€2000 1.34 (.93, 1.93) .97 (.67, 1.41) 1.15 (.72, 1.84) .81 (.50, 1.31) .87 (.56, 1.34) .69 (.44, 1.09)
€2000–€2500 1.64 (1.16, 2.31) .97 (.66, 1.42) 1.58 (1.01, 2.46) .87 (.55, 1.40) .94 (.61, 1.45) .68 (.42, 1.07)
>€2500 1.93 (1.28, 2.91) 1.01 (.65, 1.58) 2.48 (1.53, 4.01) 1.18 (.71, 1.95) 1.07 (.65, 1.77) .71 (.41, 1.22)

aAll models were adjusted for confounders: sex, age, living together with a partner, country of birth, children living at home and employment status and fruit and vegetable consumption

bAll models included cultural participation, educational level, household equivalent income, sex, age, living together with a partner, country of birth, children living at home, employment status and fruit and vegetable consumption