Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;7(1):41–46. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2014-100550

Table 3.

A comparison of tolerability between DBE and conventional endoscopy

Pain Discomfort Distress
OGD vs DBE oral 0 vs 4 (p<0.001) 2 vs 5 (p=0.003) 2 vs 4 (p=0.040)
Colon vs DBE anal 5 vs 7 (p=0.122) 6 vs 6 (p=0.341) 3 vs 3 (p=0.802)
FS vs DBE anal 5 vs 7 (p=0.034) 5 vs 6 (p=0.075) 4 vs 3 (p=0.857)
ERCP vs DBE oral 0 vs 4 (p<0.001) 2 vs 5 (p<0.001) 0 vs 4 (p<0.001)
ERCP vs DBE anal 0 vs 7 (p<0.001) 2 vs 6 (p<0.001) 0 vs 3 (p=0.030)
CE vs DBE oral 0 vs 4 (p<0.001) 0 vs 5 (p<0.001) 0 vs 4 (p<0.001)
CE vs DBE anal 0 vs 7 (p<0.001) 0 vs 6 (p<0.001) 0 vs 3 (p<0.001)

Significance value is set at p<0.007 due to a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing of data.

CE, capsule endoscopy; DBE, double balloon enteroscopy; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography; FS, flexible sigmoidoscopy; OGD, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.