Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 25;14(2):268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.03.007

Table 4.

Comparison of Normal compressive force, Shear force, and sagittal moment (M − positive in extention) among our current model (CASE I) and literature data.

El Rich et al. (2004) Error Galbusera et al. (2014) Error Current
Normal Force [N]
T12 3,36E+02 (−4%) \ \ 3,50E+02
L1 4,03E+02 (−3%) 4,26E++02 (+2%) 4,16E+02
L2 4,45E+02 (−2%) 4,40E+02 (−3%) 4,55E+02
L3 4,97E+02 (−3%) 4,57E+02 (−10%) 5,10E+02
L4 5,34E+02 (−2%) 5,08E+02 (−7%) 5,47E+02
L5 5,75E+02 (+4%) 5,50E+02 (0%) 5,51E+02



Shear Force [N]
T12 −3,80E+01 (+9%) \ \ −3,50E+01
L1 −5,10E+01 (−2%) −4,50E+01 (−13%) −5,20E+01
L2 −7,10E+01 (−6%) −5,00E+01 (−34%) −7,58E+01
L3 −9,00E+00 (−12%) −1,50E+01 (+47%) −1,02E+01
L4 3,10E+01 (−4%) 1,00E+00 (−97%) 3,22E+01
L5 2,18E+02 (−13%) 1,85E+02 (−26%) 2,50E+02



Moment [N m]
T12 −8,30E+00 (−5%) \ \ −8,75E+00
L1 −6,30E+00 (−9%) −5,00E+00 (−28%) −6,93E+00
L2 −3,90E+00 (−14%) −2,90E+00 (−36%) −4,55E+00
L3 −1,50E+00 (+17%) −7,00E−01 (−45%) −1,28E+00
L4 −1,30E+00 (−10%) −7,00E−01 (−51%) −1,44E+00
L5 −2,30E+00 (+17%) −2,00E+00 (+2%) −1,97E+00