Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 20;2017(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub5

Coope 1986.

Methods Multicentre study
Randomisation: participants were randomised on a 50:50 basis without stratification using random number tables. Opaque envelopes were supplied in sequence from the trial administrative centre that gave instructions for allocation to treatment or control group.
Loss to follow‐up: not stated
Mean duration of follow‐up: 4.4 years
Participants Geographic region: England and Wales
Study setting: primary care
Number of participants: 884 (31% men)
Age range: 60 to 79 years (mean: 65 years)
Race: not stated
Exclusion criteria: atrial fibrillation, A‐V heart block, ventricular failure, bronchial asthma, diabetes mellitus (needing pharmacological treatment) or any serious concomitant disease, and untreated hypertension with levels persistently > 280 mmHg for SBP or 120 mmHg for DBP or people already being treated for hypertension (within 3 months)
Mean BP at entry: 196.4/98.8 mmHg
BP entry criteria: not stated
Comorbid conditions: smoking 215 (24%)
Interventions Beta‐blocker group:
Step 1: atenolol 100 mg/day
Step 2: bendrofluazide 5 mg/day
Step 3: methyldopa 500 mg/day
Step 4: any other recognised therapy such as nifedipine retard 20 mg twice daily
Control group:
No treatment
Proportion on assigned treatment at end of study: beta‐blocker group: 70%
Outcomes Total mortality
CHD mortality: fatal MI, sudden death
CHD morbidity: non‐fatal MI
Cerebrovascular mortality: fatal stroke
Cerebrovascular morbidity: non‐fatal stroke
Cardiovascular mortality: fatal stroke, MI, sudden death, ventricular failure, ruptured aneurysm, hypertensive nephropathy
Cardiovascular morbidity: non‐fatal stroke, MI, non‐fatal ventricular failure
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Used random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Used opaque sequentially numbered envelopes supplied by the trial administrative centre
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blind outcome assessment
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not indicated whether reasons for missing outcome data were similar across treatment groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No access to protocol
Other bias Unclear risk Other antihypertensive drugs added to randomly allocated treatment to control BP. The observed effects may equally have resulted from the different additional drugs.