Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 27;8(10):16445–16455. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14860

Table 2. Stratified analysis of pooled hazard ratios of breast cancer patients with reduced E-cadherin expression on OS and DFS.

Stratified
analysis
OS DFS
Pooled HR (95%CI) Meta-regression
P value
Heterogeneity Pooled HR (95%CI) Meta-regression
P value
Heterogeneity
fixed random I2 P value fixed random I2 P value
Year 0.937 0.791
< 2010 1.32 (1.12,1.56) 1.85 (1.22,2.81) 79.0% < 0.001 1.38 (1.20,1.59) 1.69 (1.19,2.40) 79.9% < 0.001
≥ 2010 1.46 (1.23,1.73) 1.77 (1.30,2.41) 57.4% 0.002 1.49 (1.29,1.73) 1.58 (1.21,1.99) 63.2% 0.001
Nation 0.209 0.925
Asia 1.56 (1.30,1.88) 2.12 (1.45,3.09) 68.9% < 0.001 1.44 (1.21,1.71) 1.61 (1.13,2.28) 69.6% < 0.001
Non-Asia 1.27 (1.08,1.48) 1.51 (1.09,2.08) 65.8% 0.001 1.43 (1.27,1.61) 1.63 (1.24,2.14) 74.3% < 0.001
HR estimate 0.637 0.485
Directly 1.65 (1.30,2.09) 1.77 (1.41,2.28) 55.5% 0.028 1.67 (1.23,2.26) 1.63 (1.40,1.91) 62.4% 0.009
Calculated 0.99 (0.83,1.19) 1.60 (0.93,2.75) 81.3% < 0.001 1.13 (0.75,1.71) 0.94 (0.79,1.13) 74.1% 0.004
Curves 1.92 (1.55,2.39) 1.92 (1.55,2.39) 0.0% 0.693 1.93 (1.59,2.34) 1.93 (1.59,2.34) 0.0% 0.512
Scoring criteria 0.024 0.423
Percentage 2.19 (1.78,2.70) 2.19 (1.78,2.70) 0.0% 0.613 2.11 (1.52,2.92) 2.13 (1.68,2.70) 38.5% 0.135
Intensity 0.93 (0.74,1.16) 1.21 (0.68,2.15) 72.9% 0.011 1.19 (0.76,1.87) 1.09 (0.92,1.30) 79.6% 0.001
Combined 1.22 (1.00,1.48) 1.33 (0.84,2.10) 74.8% 0.003 1.58 (1.20,2.09) 1.47 (1.27,1.70) 63.3% 0.004
Location 0.061 0.031
M 1.24 (1.09,1.41) 1.57 (1.17,2.10) 71.8 % < 0.001 1.29 (1.16,1.45) 1.37 (1.07,1.75) 73.8% < 0.001
C, M 2.80 (1.92,4.10) 2.80 (1.92,4.10) 0% 0.925 3.35 (2.03,5.53) 3.35 (2.03,5.53) 0.0% 0.529
Pathological type
IDC 1.13 (0,97,1.32) 1.61 (1.09,2.39) 78.1% < 0.001 1.12 (0.95,1.31) 1.58 (1.03,2.44) 82.4% < 0.001