Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Dec 14;23(3):436–444. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.11.021

Table 1.

Patient Variables Split by MICA-Matched versus MICA-Mismatched within 10/10 and 9/10 HLA Matching

Variable MICA Matched MICA Mismatched P Value*
No. of patients 522 191
No. of centers   99   63
Recipient age at transplantation, yr .42
 10–19   12 (2)     8 (4)
 20–29   84 (16)   37 (19)
 30–39   64 (12)   20 (10)
 40–49 111 (21)   34 (18)
 50–59 251 (48)   92 (48)
 Median (range)   49 (18–74)   49 (18–75) .29
Recipient race/ethnicity .36
 Caucasian, non-Hispanic 481 (94) 169 (90)
 African-American, non-Hispanic     5 (1)     5 (3)
 Asian, non-Hispanic     4 (1)     3 (2)
 Native American, non-Hispanic     2 (<1) 0
 Hispanic, Caucasian   18 (4)   10 (5)
 Hispanic, African-American     1 (<1) 0
 Hispanic, race unknown     1 (<1)     1 (1)
 Unknown   10 (N/A)     3 (N/A)
Recipient sex .64
 Male 274 (52) 104 (54)
 Female 248 (48)   87 (46)
Karnofsky score .30
 10–80 177 (37)   58 (32)
 90–100 305 (63) 121 (68)
 Unknown   40 (N/A)   12 (N/A)
Disease at transplantation .67
 AML 293 (56) 102 (53)
 ALL   83 (16)   29 (15)
 MDS 146 (28)   60 (31)
Disease status at transplantation .97
 Early 365 (70) 134 (70)
 Intermediate     4 (1)     2 (1)
 Advanced 133 (25)   47 (25)
 Other   20 (4)     8 (4)

Data presented are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

*

The Pearson chi-square test was used for comparing discrete variables; the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparing continuous variables.