Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 21;47(1):25–31. doi: 10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.25

Table 2. Comparisons between the imaging techniques.

graphic file with name isd-47-25-i002.jpg

P values were determined using the chi-square test.

IT, imaging technique; 0, without defect; 1, 0.6 mm defect; 2, 1.0 mm defect; 3, 1.4 mm defect; 4, 1.8 mm defect; CD, correct diagnosis; DPR, digital periapical radiography; CBCT, cone-beam computed tomography.

: in general, §: in the mandible, ¥: in the maxilla; #: in single-rooted teeth, δ: in multi-rooted teeth.