Table 1.

Learner and instructor evaluation responses.

	Mean Likert scorea	SD (population)	Number of “disagree” responses (Likert score 1 or 2)	Number of “agree” responses (Likert score 3 or 4)	Percent with an “agree” response
Learners: lecture content
I learned the stated objectives	3.76	0.43	0	55	100
This topic and content are useful to my daily work	3.83	0.36	0	55	100
My work in the community is going to change/improve through this lecture	3.75	0.48	1	54	98.2
This lecture improves my knowledge of this topic	3.83	0.37	0	55	100
The quantity of the information included in this teaching was appropriate	3.74	0.44	0	55	100
The quantity of material in this lecture is appropriate for teaching via telehealth	3.67	0.47	0	55	100
Learners: technology
I could hear the instructor well	3.67	0.58	3	52	94.5
I could see the instructor well	3.43	0.76	7	48	87.3
The system is easy to use	3.67	0.51	1	54	98.2
This teaching was convenient in my schedule of daily work	3.72	0.45	0	55	100
Learners: connection to instructor
This mode of teaching maintained my interest	3.74	0.44	0	55	100
I feel connected to the instructor	3.70	0.46	0	55	100
I believe the instructor cared about my learning	3.83	0.37	0	55	100
This lecture was as good via telehealth as in person	3.46	0.60	3	52	94.5
Instructors: technology
I could see the learners well	2.86	1.01	9	13	59.1
I could hear the learners well	3.36	0.71	3	19	86.4
The system is easy to use	3.73	0.45	0	22	100
This format was convenient for me	3.95	0.21	0	22	100
Instructors: connection to the learners
I feel connected to the learners	3.09	0.60	3	19	86.4

^aAnswered on a 4-point Likert scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, 4 = strongly agree.