Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;10:19. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0250-9

Table 2.

Clinicopathological information for patients in the METABRIC data set

Training set Validation set
Basal I Basal II Basal I Basal II
Age [years]
≤ 40 7 18 4 17
41 to 50 11 18 10 21
51 to 60 8 20 9 16
> 60 9 24 13 35
mean 50.6 52.5 54.7 54.1
p-value 0.46 0.8
MS
Pre/post 18/17 36/43 15/21 37/52
Pre/post (%) 51.4% 45.6% 41.7% 41.6%
p-value 0.31 1
Size [cm]
≤ 2 cm 15 30 17 32
> 2 cm 20 50 19 55
Mean 23.5 30.6 22.1 29.6
p-value 0.01 0.005
Grade
Grade 2 2 8 5 3
Grade 3 33 71 30 85
Na 0 1 1 1
Mean 2.9 2.9 2.9 3
p-value 0.4 0.092
NPI
≤2.4 0 1 1 1
2.4 to 3.4 1 6 3 2
3.4 to 5.4 28 62 27 77
>5.4 6 11 5 9
Mean 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6
p-value 0.43 0.7
Lymph Node
Neg/pos 16/19 37/43 17/19 47/42
Neg/pos (%) 45.7% 46.2% 47.2% 52.8%
p-value 1 0.34
Histology
ILC 0 2 0 1
IDC 28 70 23 83
IDC-med 7 5 9 3
Others 0 3 4 2
p-value 0.001 5.4·10−8
p53
Mut/wild 1/15 11/14 2/11 12/17
Mut/wild (%) 6.25% 44% 15.4% 41.4%
p-value 1.1·10−7 7·10−4
Population size
35 80 36 89

The clinicopathological features described are: Age in years, menopausal status (MS), tumour Size in cm, tumour Grade [1–3], Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), Lymph Node invasion, histopathological classification (Histology) and p53 status, for Basal I and II subgroups in the METABRIC discovery and validation sets. In all cases, the p-value indicates the significance of the difference between Basal I and II subgroups. For numerical variables (Age, Size, Grade, and NPI) it was calculated using the ANOVA on ranks; for the categorical (MS, Lymph Node, Histology, p53), a binomial test was used. Population sizes for each group are indicated in the last row. Tumour histology is as follows: IDC=Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, ILC=Invasive Lobular Carcinoma, IDC-med=Medullary Carcinoma, and others include tubular, mucinous and phyllodes tumours