Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s40337-017-0141-7

Table 1.

Participant, sample, design, outcome measures, QualSyst score and key findings for studies with longitudinal and prospective designs

Study Country Participant age (years) Sample size Participant gender Participant ethnicity Sample population Design Outcome measure Qual Syst score Protective factors identified
Ahren, Chiesa, Koupil, Magnusson, Dalman & Goodman (2013) [24] Sweden 12 to 23 249894 Mixed (49% female) Not described Stockholm Youth Cohort Prospective cohort study Cases of ED 1.000 Having full siblings (for females only)
Allen, Gibson, McLean, Davis & Byrne (2014) [22] Australia M = 10.78
SD = 1.72
211 Mixed (54% female) Not described Childhood Growth and Development Cohort Longitudinal design (2 years) ChEDE, CARES (emotional eating) 1.000 Child satisfaction with family life
Berge, Maclehose, Loth, Eisenberg, Bucchianeri, Neumark-Sztainer (2013)* [23] USA M = 14.4
SD = 2.0
2348 Mixed (53% female) (Separate analyses) 18.9% White, 29.0% Black, 19.9% Asian, 16.9%Hispanic, 3.7% Native American, 11.6% mixed/other School students in Project EAT (+parents) Longitudinal study (2 years) Dieting/unhealthy or extreme WCBs/binge eating in last year (Yes/No) .900 Parent discussions around healthy eating.
NOT parent discussions about weight
Ferreiro, Seoana & Senra (2012) [34] Spain M = 10.84
SD = .78
942 Mixed (49% female) (Separate analyses) 98.5% White School students Longitudinal study (4 years) ChEAT – Spanish Version .900 Social support (feeling loved and supported by family) (boys only)
Haines, Gillman, Rifas-Shiman, Field & Austin (2009) ~ [31] USA M = 11.9
SD = 1.6
13448 Mixed (56% female) (Separate analyses) 93% White Growing Up Today (GUTS) cohort Longitudinal design (4 years) Vomiting/use of laxatives/binge eating monthly, dieting weekly (Yes/No) .900 Family meals
Haines, Kleinman, Rifas-Shiman, Field & Byrn Austin (2010) ~ [32] USA 11 – 18 10540 Mixed (57% female) (Separate analyses) Not described Growing Up Today (GUTS) cohort Longitudinal design (4 years) Vomiting/use of laxatives/binge eating in past year. Overweight .850 Family meals
Neumark-Sztainer, Eisenberg, Fulkerson, Story & Larson (2008)* [30] USA 1/3 M = 12.8 ± 0.8,
2/3 M = 15.8 ± 0.8
2516 Mixed (55% Female) (Separate analyses) 48.5% White, 19.2% Asian, 19.0% African American, 5.8%
Hispanic, 3.5% Native American, 3.9% Mixed/Other
School students in Project EAT Longitudinal design (5 years) Chronic dieting/unhealthy or extreme WCBs/binge eating in the last year (Yes/No) .950 Family meals
Neumark-Sztainer, Wall, Story & Sherwood, (2009)* [28] USA M = 12.7 ± 0.8 412 Mixed (56% female) (Separate analyses) 45% White, 24% African-American, 16% Hispanic, 6% Asian, 5% Native American, 4% mixed/other School students in Project EAT identified as overweight Longitudinal design (5 years) Extreme WCBs/binge eating in the last year (Yes/No) .950 Family meals.
Family connectedness
Neumark-Sztainer, Wall, Haines, Story, Sherwood & Van der Berg (2007)* [29] USA 1/3 M = 12.8 ± 0.8,
2/3 M = 15.8 ± 0.8
2380 Mixed (55% female) (Separate analyses) 48.5% White, 19.2% Asian, 19.0% African American, 5.8%
Hispanic, 3.5% Native American, 3.9% Mixed/Other
School students in Project EAT Longitudinal design (5 years) Extreme WCBs, binge eating in the last year (Yes/No). Overweight. .850 Family meals
Nicholls & Viner (2009) [25] UK 30 11211 Mixed Not described 1970 British Cohort Study Prospective cohort study Cases of AN .950 High maternal BMI. NOT parenting style

*/#/~ = same participant sample