Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;18:59. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1188-0

Table 3.

Comparison of runtime and clustering accuracy (measured by adjusted rand index) between CIDR and four other algorithms on a simulation data set with 10,000 cells

Simulation (10K) CIDR CIDR (L) prcomp t-SNE RaceID ZIFA
Time 44.5 min 1.5 h 3.1 h 21.8 h >14 day 1.6 daya
Adjusted rand index 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.00 N/Ab 0.09

CIDR is the default CIDR algorithm implementation with step function simplification, while CIDR (L) is the implementation with the non-simplified logistic function. The algorithms except ZIFA were run on an AWS ec2 r3.2xlarge instance

aZIFA ran out of memory on the AWS ec2 r3.2xlarge instance, and its runtime was recorded from a run on an AWS ec2 r3.8xlarge instance

bRaceID did not complete after 14 days