Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 17;11(3):e0005460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005460

Table 2. Summary of factors that influence canine rabies vaccination uptake.

Level Main themes Barriers Identified Facilitators Identified
Individual 1.1 Insufficient knowledge about the vaccination campaign and rabies • Lack of information about the campaign
• Insufficient knowledge of rabies and rabies vaccination
• Belief that purebred dogs are more vulnerable to illnesses than mongrels
• Exposure to communication about rabies and the vaccination campaign
1.2 Mistrust in quality of vaccination services and vaccine • Mistrust of vaccine quality and staff competence
• Consider the service and attention not warm enough
• Bad previous experiences at campaign
1.3 High perceived risk of rabies for dogs and families • Attitude of indifference towards rabies and the campaign
• Low motivation to invest the time or effort in vaccination
• Fear of rabies
• Believe that dogs’ health guarantees family´s safety and health
• Awareness of many canine rabies cases in their district
1.4 Logistical factors • Difficulty in transporting dogs to the vaccination sites
• Risk of dog fights at vaccination sites
• Low knowledge about the dog vaccination campaign
• Affection and sense of duty towards their dogs
• Recent experience of dog bites
Interpersonal 2.1 Social norms regarding relationship with dogs and dog care • Norms around dog ownership—functional relationship with the dog (e.g. guard dog)
• No norm of walking dog on leashes
• Emotional relationship with the dog (e.g. pet)
2.2 Social pressure from the community to vaccinate–or not • Evasiveness/aggressiveness or mockery if asked about vaccinating dog
• Perception that neighbors who do not vaccinate have more urgent needs
• Social pressure: not wanting to get in trouble if their dog bit another
• Pressure to vaccinate from other people (e.g. family, veterinarians)
Organizational 3.1 Insufficient health promotion and communication for dog vaccination campaigns • Untimely advertisement of time of campaigns
• Difficulty understanding megaphone messages
• Lack of advertisement of vaccination point locations
• Insufficient identification of personnel
3.2 Inadequate location and low frequency of mass vaccination campaign • Infrequent vaccination campaigns
• Inadequate vaccination point locations.
• Door to door vaccination would help, particularly mentioned by peri-urban residents
3.3 Limited personnel vaccinating during the campaign • Long lines at vaccination points
• Vaccination points accesible for short periods
• Gratuity of vaccine
• Possibility of receiving other dog services at the same time, such as de-worming
Community 4.1 Distance to vaccination point and difficult topography • Distance and access to vaccination campaigns
• Steep slopes and unlevel terrain in peri-urban areas
• Large avenues in urban areas
4.2 Local security and poor housing materials • Poor housing material impedes keeping dogs within the house (i.e. they break loose).
• Lack of animal care culture: dogs on the streets, finding their own food, not sterilized. This is worse in peri-urban area.
• In peri-urban areas, where security is worse, people have multiple dogs–harder to manage in a vaccine campaign.
• Door to door campaign would facilitate process for those with multiple, possibly aggressive dogs–and dogs not used to having leashes