Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;8(2):e00092-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00092-17

TABLE 1 .

Representative results of bioinformatic analysis for identification of MupP candidates

Multigenome comparisona with P. putida KT2440 reference genome No. of protein matchesb HAD-like phosphatase candidate(s)
Pseudomonadalesc 94 PP_1764, PP_1907, PP_5147
Gammaproteobacteriad 65 PP_1764, PP_1907
Gammaproteobacteriae 48 PP_1764, PP_1907
Gammaproteobacteriaf 33 PP_1764
Betaproteobacteriag 109 PP_1764, PP_5147
a

All selected genomes contain amgK and murU orthologs.

b

E. coli matches were excluded; amgK and murU were found.

c

Acinetobacter baumannii 1656-2, Azotobacter vinelandii CA, Cellvibrio japonicus Ueda107, Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1, and Psychrobacter arcticus 273-4.

d

Aeromonas salmonicida. salmonicida A449, Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396, Idiomarina loihiensis L2TR, Shewanella denitrificans OS217, and Thioalkalimicrobium aerophilum AL3.

e

Kangiella geojedonensis KCTC 23420, Saccharophagus degradans 2-40, Thioalkalivibrio paradoxus ARh 1, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99A, and Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans SS3.

f

Halomonas elongata DSM 2581, Xylella fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa GB514, Thiomicrospira crunogena XCL-2, Shewanella baltica OS117, and Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8.

g

Azoarcus sp. strain BH72, Burkholderia mallei ATCC 23344, Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 1971, Ralstonia eutropha H16, and Thiobacillus denitrificans ATCC 25259.