Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;8:525. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00525

Table 3.

Validation of IIPs that correlate with Lactococcus, Corynebacterium, or Bacillus.

Total IIPs Treatment Consistent IIPs Conflict IIPs No difference
Lactococcus 65 G1 34 (52.3%) 15 (23.1%) 16 (24.6%)
G2 30 (46.2%) 14 (21.5%) 21 (32.3%)
G3 28 (43.1%) 19 (29.2%) 18 (27.7%)
G4 31 (47.7%) 16 (24.6%) 18 (27.7%)
Corynebcaterium 57 G1 27 (47.4%) 18 (31.6%) 12 (21.1%)
G2 27 (47.4%) 13 (22.8%) 17 (29.8%)
G3 31 (54.4%) 17 (29.8%) 9 (15.8%)
G4 31 (54.4%) 13 (22.8%) 13 (22.8%)
Bacillus 52 G1 24 (46.2%) 18 (34.6%) 10 (19.2%)
G2 24 (46.2%) 14 (26.9%) 14 (26.9%)
G3 23 (44.2%) 19 (36.5%) 10 (19.2%)
G4 27 (51.9%) 13 (25%) 12 (23.1%)

Values are number of IIRs that correlate with Lactococcus, Corynebacterium, or Bacillus in each treatment group. The value in parentheses corresponds to the ratio of consistent IIPs, conflict IIPs, and no difference. L. garvieae (G1), C. variabile (G2), B. coagulans (G3), and a combination of the three strains (G4).