Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;7:45269. doi: 10.1038/srep45269

Table 3. Comparison of classification performance by six different methods (in %).

Method AD vs. NC
MCI vs. NC
pMCI vs. sMCI
ACC SPE SEN AUC ACC SPE SEN AUC ACC SPE SEN AUC
no FS (MRI only) 88.3 81.9 92.2 94.1 72.5 80.7 42.9 72.0 68.4 59.4 75.9 73.2
no FS (SNP only) 77.3 75.3 80.6 85.3 74.8 83.2 36.1 74.1 73.1 67.7 80.8 79.2
no FS (MRI + SNP) 87.5 81.6 90.3 95.6 73.8 85.1 53.6 80.6 74.7 64.5 78.8 83.4
Laplacian score33 87.7 83.3 90.9 94.3 73.9 85.1 53.0 81.4 76.6 65.2 78.8 77.6
Pearson correlation34 87.8 84.9 89.7 94.6 73.7 83.6 53.3 79.1 77.1 66.9 82.5 78.6
t-test31 87.8 84.5 90.3 94.2 73.1 84.4 53.1 80.4 76.0 65.5 78.3 78.1
Fisher score32 88.8 85.9* 91.4 94.9 73.6 84.9 57.4 82.1 76.7 68.0 83.8 78.4
LASSO35 89.2 83.6 90.7 95.8 74.7 87.3 57.6 83.2 76.3 68.1 83.0 77.9
RIML17 89.4 85.0* 90.2 94.9 75.6 85.2 56.4 83.9 77.0 68.6 84.4* 84.9
HMFSS 90.8 84.1 94.3 97.1* 77.9* 84.0 65.9 85.4 78.6 69.2* 84.9* 85.7
ss-HMFSS 92.4 86.0 95.9 97.4 80.1 85.5* 67.7 87.2 80.8 71.5 85.4 88.3

Symbol indicates p < 0.01 in the t-test as compared to the best method, and * means p < 0.05.