Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 29;17:231. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3212-x

Table 5.

The proposed interpretation of possible mechanisms behind distribution of Ki-67 values among subgroups of different immunohistochemical cancer phenotypes

HER2 & ER/PgR Breast cancer phenotypes Model proposed subdivision of breast cancers, based on mitotic activity
LMA (low mitotic activity) Ki67 < 25% IMA (intermediate mitotic activity)Ki-67 25–65% HMA (high mitotic activity)Ki-67 > 65%
HER2
0+ to 3+
ER + PgR+ ~67% of all patients
probably HER2 dependent mitotic rates, thus intermediate mitotic rates seem dependent on the increased HER2 expression
~ 1% of all patients
high mitotic rate due to unknown promiotic mechanism
ER + PgR- ~26% of all patients
mitotic rates do not seem closely regulated by normal HER2 expression (0+ to 2+), HER2 3+ increases number of IMA tumors
ER-PgR- ~6% of all patients
high mitotic rate due to unknown promiotic mechanism, HER2 3+ reduces number of HMA tumors
Open questions 168 out of 769 LMA cancers were HER2 3+
Can HER2 molecules in HER2 3+ & LMA cancers be dysfunctional?
99 out of 323 IMA cancers were HER2 absent
Is there another promitotic mechanism in HER2 absent & IMA tumors, particularly in 55 ER + PgR+ cancers?
43 out of 106 triple-negative & HER2 absent cancers were HMA
What promotes the highest mitotic rates in HER2 absent ER-PgR- tumors?