Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):530. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030530

Table 1.

Raw data and statistical methods. Bullets: Actograms from these mice are shown in Figure 2.

Measurement over 10–12 Days.
Interstrain Comparisons of mean MoA and General Stability via Kruskal–Wallace/Conover–Iman Tests
Mean MoA [hZT] SDev MoA [hZT] Qp [%] General Stability [Arbitrary Units]
C3H
(mouse ID)
(19) ● 16.10 0.4691 37.0 78.8
(30) 15.41 0.1969 45.4 230.6
(4) 17.25 0.4369 34.2 78.3
(3) 16.25 0.3379 39.4 116.6
(2) 16.75 0.4983 37.9 76.9
(1) 16.42 0.3935 34.4 87.4
C3H MT 1 KO
(mouse ID)
(17) 15.83 0.3878 41.1 106.0
(16) 16.17 0.4522 37.2 82.3
(15) 16.58 0.4931 42.5 86.2
(13) 16.75 0.4397 36.3 82.6
(24) 16.75 0.3809 37.5 98.4
(14) 16.92 0.2500 40.0 160.0
C3H MT 2 KO
(mouse ID)
(7) 15.42 0.3472 40.3 116.1
(6 15.83 0.3206 45.1 140.7
(18) 17.25 0.4346 30.4 69.9
(5) 16.25 0.6314 37.4 59.3
(8) 16.50 0.5503 29.7 53.9
(23) 16.12 0.1476 44.0 298.1
C3H MT 1,2 KO
(mouse ID)
(12) 16.42 0.3685 39.2 106.4
(20) ● 17.67 0.8963 27.3 30.5
(9 16.67 0.6432 23.4 36.4
(10) 17.08 0.8579 24.3 28.3
(11) 16.42 0.7010 32.9 46.9
(21) 16.42 0.3839 28.9 75.3
C57Bl
(mouse ID)
(16) 17.41 1.1429 31.5 27.6
(13) ● 22.58 1.1279 27.0 23.9
(11) 17.50 0.5294 28.1 53.1
(7) 20.75 1.8064 18.2 10.1
(12) 18.67 1.6379 20.5 12.5
(10) 20.25 1.0628 24.3 22.9
(26) 17.00 0.4625 35.8 77.4
(25) 17.50 0.5966 35.0 58.7
(27) 17.33 1.1021 35.4 32.1