Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 29;8:184. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00184

Table 4.

Bone Mineral density (BMD) of immobilized Wistar rats.

7 DAYS 14 DAYS 28 DAYS ANOVA
BONE CONTROL IMMO CONTROL IMMO CONTROL IMMO I T IXT
LV-25 175.1 ± 3.9 (5) 173.4 ± 2.6 (6) 183.5 ± 2.4 (9) 172.7 ± 2.2 (12) 189.9 ± 3.5 (5) 180.1 ± 4.2 (6) 0.006 0.011 ns
HUMERUS 159.8 ± 2.1 (5) 162.8 ± 2.2 (6) 169.6 ± 2.9 (9) 165.2 ± 2.0 (12) 175.3 ± 2.0 (5) 175.6 ± 2.6 (6) ns 0.001 ns
FOREARM 154.9 ± 2.3 (5) 161.8 ± 2.5 (6) 162.2 ± 4.7 (9) 161.0 ± 1.9 (12) 165.9 ± 4.6 (5) 166.9 ± 3.0 (6) ns ns ns
TIBIA 150.7 ± 0.9 (5) 150.6 ± 0.8 (6) 159.2 ± 0.9 (8) 152.9 ± 1.9 (12) 165.6 ± 1.8 (5) 164.2 ± 2.6 (6) ns 0.001 ns
FEMUR 196.5 ± 3.3 (5) 198.8 ± 1.2 (6) 208.5 ± 2.4 (9) 201.3 ± 4.1 (12) 219.1 ± 2.6 (5) 213.7 ± 4.0 (6) ns 0.001 ns

Mean ± SEM for the number of animals indicated in parentheses for control (CONTROL) and immobilized (IMMO) groups are shown for every period. Bone Mineral density (BMD) was measured by peripheral Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (pDEXA) analysis and expressed as mg/cm2. Statistical significance was tested by a full factorial two-way ANOVA (fixed factors: I, immobilization, T, Time; IxT denotes the interaction term). p-values are shown in the three columns on the right (ns, non-significant differences, which implies a p-value equal to or greater than 0.05).