Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2016 Jun 11;205:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.011

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinical characteristics US- and Dutch sample.

US sample
Dutch sample
P
N % n %
Offspring
Bipolar offspring 224 100 136 100
Mean age, sd 13.51 2.3 14.12 2.2   .02
Sex, girls 113 50.4 66 48.5   .72
Living with both biological parents 92 41.1 100 73.5 <.001
Caucasian 187 83.5 121 89.0   .15
Family
Families 159 100 93 100
Employment 105 66.0 83 89.2 <.001
Bipolar parent
Sex, female 124 78.0 55 59.1   .001
Bipolar I disorder 107 67.3 75 80.6   .02
Substance use disorder 104 65.4 14 15.1 <.001
Age of BD onset:
− < 19 80 50.3 24 25.8 <.001
− 19–25 41 25.8 31 33.3
− >25 33 20.8 38 40.9
Biological co-parent
Mood disorder 37 23.3 16 17.2   .06
Substance use disorder 43 27.0 3 3.2 <.001
Mania 2 1.6 1 1.1 1.00
Psychosis 0 0 1 1.1   .423
Source of recruitment <.001
- Advertisement 101 63.5 4 4.3
- Psychiatric clinics 58 36.5 35 37.6
- Patient advocacy groups 0 0 54 56.1
Informant Categorical psychopathology, K-SADS-PL
Single informanta 224 100 78 57.4 <.001
Motherb 197 88.7 128 94.1   .08
Bipolar parent 168 75.7 102 75.0   .89
Dimensional psychopathology, CBCLc
Motherc 169 79.0 75 67.0   .02
Bipolar parent 214 95.5 112 82.3   .01
a

One informant versus both parents.

b

Mother versus father or significant other (n = 7).

c

As the majority of CBCLs were completed by the bipolar proband; only CBCLs completed by the bipolar proband were selected for further analyses. In total, nine subjects in the US sample and one subject in the Dutch sample had a missing value rate over 5% and were excluded from the analyses.