Table 1.
US sample
|
Dutch sample
|
P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | n | % | ||
Offspring | |||||
Bipolar offspring | 224 | 100 | 136 | 100 | |
Mean age, sd | 13.51 | 2.3 | 14.12 | 2.2 | .02 |
Sex, girls | 113 | 50.4 | 66 | 48.5 | .72 |
Living with both biological parents | 92 | 41.1 | 100 | 73.5 | <.001 |
Caucasian | 187 | 83.5 | 121 | 89.0 | .15 |
Family | |||||
Families | 159 | 100 | 93 | 100 | |
Employment | 105 | 66.0 | 83 | 89.2 | <.001 |
Bipolar parent | |||||
Sex, female | 124 | 78.0 | 55 | 59.1 | .001 |
Bipolar I disorder | 107 | 67.3 | 75 | 80.6 | .02 |
Substance use disorder | 104 | 65.4 | 14 | 15.1 | <.001 |
Age of BD onset: | |||||
− < 19 | 80 | 50.3 | 24 | 25.8 | <.001 |
− 19–25 | 41 | 25.8 | 31 | 33.3 | |
− >25 | 33 | 20.8 | 38 | 40.9 | |
Biological co-parent | |||||
Mood disorder | 37 | 23.3 | 16 | 17.2 | .06 |
Substance use disorder | 43 | 27.0 | 3 | 3.2 | <.001 |
Mania | 2 | 1.6 | 1 | 1.1 | 1.00 |
Psychosis | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.1 | .423 |
Source of recruitment | <.001 | ||||
- Advertisement | 101 | 63.5 | 4 | 4.3 | |
- Psychiatric clinics | 58 | 36.5 | 35 | 37.6 | |
- Patient advocacy groups | 0 | 0 | 54 | 56.1 | |
Informant Categorical psychopathology, K-SADS-PL | |||||
Single informanta | 224 | 100 | 78 | 57.4 | <.001 |
Motherb | 197 | 88.7 | 128 | 94.1 | .08 |
Bipolar parent | 168 | 75.7 | 102 | 75.0 | .89 |
Dimensional psychopathology, CBCLc | |||||
Motherc | 169 | 79.0 | 75 | 67.0 | .02 |
Bipolar parent | 214 | 95.5 | 112 | 82.3 | .01 |
One informant versus both parents.
Mother versus father or significant other (n = 7).
As the majority of CBCLs were completed by the bipolar proband; only CBCLs completed by the bipolar proband were selected for further analyses. In total, nine subjects in the US sample and one subject in the Dutch sample had a missing value rate over 5% and were excluded from the analyses.