Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov;25(4):576–589. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0050

Table 9.

Statistical comparison of differences in group means for each vibratory feature using videostroboscopy and simulated stroboscopy. Differences are statistically significant when p are less than .05 (*).

Group comparisons Videostroboscopy
Simulated stroboscopy
Difference in means SEM p Difference in means SEM p
Left mucosal wave
 Control vs. pre-surgery 15 7 .213 34 6 <.001*
 Pre- vs. post-surgery −4 5 .962 −13 4 .007*
 Post-surgery vs. control 11 7 .565 21 6 .019*
Right mucosal wave
 Control vs. pre-surgery 23 7 .007* 39 6 <.001*
 Pre- vs. post-surgery −4 4 .927 −8 3 <.001*
 Post-surgery vs. control 19 7 .049* 31 6 .103
Left amplitude
 Control vs. pre-surgery 12 2 <.001* 12 2 <.001*
 Pre- vs. post-surgery −5 2 .075 −7 2 <.001*
 Post-surgery vs. control 8 2 .027* 5 2 .298
Right amplitude
 Control vs. pre-surgery 13 2 <.001* 10 2 <.001*
 Pre- vs. post-surgery −3 1 .151 −4 1 .002*
 Post-surgery vs. control 9 2 <.001* 5 2 .101
Left vocal fold edge
 Control vs. pre-surgery −36 5 <.001* −32 4 <.001*
 Pre- vs. post-surgery 10 3 .026* 13 3 <.001*
 Post-surgery vs. control −26 5 <.001* −19 4 <.001*
Right vocal fold edge
 Control vs. pre-surgery −3 5 <.001* −30 4 <.001*
 Pre- vs. post-surgery 6 3 .408 13 2 <.001*
 Post-surgery vs. control −25 5 <.001* −18 4 <.001*