Table 3.
Variable | Information Literacy Pearson’s r (p) |
---|---|
Baseline Attitudes Toward Panel Management | |
I routinely use the PACT* Compass** to see how my team is doing | 0.32 (0.052) |
I routinely use the PC Almanac*** to see how our panel of patients is doing | 0.55 (<0.001) |
PM**** is critical for improving the health of our patients | 0.32 (0.053) |
Outcomes at the panel level have little to do with my skills as a provider | -0.10 (0.56) |
I have sufficient training in PM | 0.30 (0.063) |
I routinely use PM | 0.44 (0.006) |
Panel Management Self-Efficacy (6-item scale) | 0.26 (0.11) |
Post-Intervention Attitudes Toward Panel Management | |
Satisfaction with PACT (3-item scale) | 0.36 (0.013) |
PM is critical for improving the health of our patients | 0.35 (0.018) |
Outcomes at the panel level have little to do with my skills as a provider | -0.46 (0.002) |
I routinely use PM | 0.57 (<0.001) |
I have sufficient training in PM | 0.17 (0.25) |
Panel Management Self-Efficacy (6-item scale) | 0.38 (0.01) |
* PACT: Patient Aligned Care Teams, VA’s Patient Centered Medical Home model
** The PACT Compass allows comparisons of local, regional, and national benchmarks of quality measures
*** The Primary Care (PC) Almanac enables providers to view and filter their patients with chronic conditions
**** Panel Management (PM)