Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: Gene Ther. 2016 Dec 20;24(3):176–186. doi: 10.1038/gt.2016.87

Table 2.

GEE Modeling of Stimulated Parotid Salivary Flow Rate with Time – Treated Gland

Time SPFR 95% CI Robust SE p-value

Model 1a
Visit 2 0.142 0.102, 0.182 0.020 <0.001*
Visit 3 −0.008 −0.043, 0.026 0.018 0.632
Visit 4 0.087 0.000, 0.175 0.045 0.051
Visit 5 0.145 −0.008, 0.298 0.078 0.063
Visit 6 0.177 0.062, 0.291 0.058 0.002*
Visit 7 0.152 −0.007, 0.311 0.081 0.061
Visit 8 0.131 0.093, 0.169 0.019 <0.001*
Visit 9 0.114 0.039, 0.189 0.038 0.003*
Visit 10 0.099 0.048, 0.151 0.026 <0.001*
Visit 11 0.176 0.113, 0.239 0.032 <0.001*
Visit 12 0.146 0.038, 0.254 0.055 0.008*
Visit 13 0.207 0.031, 0.384 0.090 0.021*
Visit 14 0.184 0.098, 0.270 0.044 <0.001*
Visit 15 (follow-up 1) 0.166 0.055, 0.277 0.057 0.003*
Visit 16 (follow-up 2) 0.269 0.140, 0.397 0.066 <0.001*

Model 1b

Time 0.009 0.005, 0.013 0.002 <0.001*

Model 2a

Peak 1 0.262 0.130, 0.395 0.068 <0.001*
Follow-up 1 0.153 0.041, 0.265 0.057 0.007*
Follow-up 2 0.255 0.128, 0.382 0.065 <0.001*

Model 2b

Time 0.049 0.006, 0.091 0.022 0.025*

SPFR: Stimulated parotid salivary flow rate. Model 1a - all 16 visits in the model with visits treated as a categorical time variable. Visit 1 is the reference (baseline). Model 1b - all 16 visits in the model with visits treated as continuous time variable. Model 2a - 4 visits (stimulated parotid salivary flow rate at peak 1, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2 visits were compared to baseline flow rates) in the model with visits treated as categorical time variable. Visit 1 is the reference (baseline). Model 2b - 4 visits in the model with visits treated as continuous time variable. Estimates are rounded to three decimal places.

*

Statistically significant.