Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar;76(2):247–255. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.247

Table 3.

Regression outcomes predicting adolescent smoking status, smoking susceptibility, and readiness to quit smoking

graphic file with name jsad.2015.76.247tbl3.jpg

Conditional logistic regression predicting smoking status Full matched sample (n = 162)
Linear regression predicting smoking susceptibility Nonsmokers (n = 78)
Linear regression predicting readiness to quit smoking Smokers (n = 84)
Variable ORa [95% CI] p β B (SE) p β B (SE) p
No. of people in network 0.94 [0.65, 1.36] .73 -.15 -.03 (.02) .17 -.002 -.001 (.04) .99
% Peers in network 1.00 [0.95, 1.05] .98 -.06 -.002 (.002) .48 .13 .006 (.006) .29
Average contact with network 0.70 [0.21, 2.38] .57 -.04 -.03 (.08) .75 .27 .46 (.21) .04*
Social support (factor score) 0.76 [0.33, 1.76] .52 .22 .08 (.05) .10 -.04 -.04 (.12) .73
Pervasiveness of smoking (factor score) 21.53 [4.08, 113.57] <.001*** .38 .26 (.07) <.001*** .07 .07 (.11) .56
Support for smoking .41 .33 (.09) .001** -.13 -.40 (.38) .30
Support for quitting .28 .49 (.23) .04*

Notes: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; no. = number.

a

Nonsmokers serve as the reference group; ns were lower in the multivariate analyses because data were missing not at random.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.