Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;18:133. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1495-3

Table 2.

Relationship between QTF categories and global perceived effect (GPE)

QTF categories 2 weeks, proportion improved
% (95% CI)
3 months, proportion improved
% (95% CI)
12 months, proportion improved
% (95% CI)
Chiropractic patients
P < 0.01*
General practice patients
P < 0.01*
Chiropractic patients
P = 0.2*
General practice patients
P = 0.2*
Chiropractic patients
P = 0.4*
General practice patients
P = 0.5*
All patients 74 (70–77) 36 (31–42) 82 (79–85) 60 (54–66) 73 (23–30) 54 (48–60)
‘LBP alone’ 77 (73–81) 49 (38–60) 82 (78–85) 69 (58–78) 74 (69–78) 53 (42–65)
‘LBP + leg pain above the knee’ 72 (64–79) 43 (28–60) 85 (79–90) 66 (49–80) 75 (67–81) 66 (48–80)
‘LBP + leg pain below the knee’ 61 (46–74) 19 (9–38) 73 (59–83) 46 (29–65) 63 (49–76) 54 (34–72)
‘LBP + NRI’ 40 (17–68) 20 (7–45) 87 (55–97) 56 (31–78) 73 (43–91) 44 (20–70)

Proportions improved after 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months

LBP low back pain, NRI nerve root involvement

*P-value for an overall association between QTF categories and GPE