Skip to main content
. 2017 May;38:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.12.021

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Image quality assessment of proposed 3D CASPR-Tiger method in healthy subjects: bar plots showing average expert scores for myocardial sharpness (0: extreme blurring to 4: no blurring) and residual artifact level (1: worst, 4: best) in the reconstructed images are shown. The associated standard deviations are also indicated. The results are compared with reference multi-slice 2D breath-hold (BH) reconstructions. Both myocardial sharpness and residual artifact scores were lower for proposed CASPR-Tiger method, when compared with reference BH method, but this did not have any major impact on cardiac functional parameters.