Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):485. doi: 10.3390/s17030485

Table 1.

Comparison of different systems.

References P/S 1 NSST 2 NV 3 ST 4 SR 5 (Meter) Technology Frequency
[10] Lying 1 10 HB 6 on Body CW 8 Radar 1 GHz
[7] Vertical: Standing/facing Antenna 1 1 RR 7 No Contact CW 8 Doppler Radar 2.45 GHz
[4] Standing/walking 1 and 2 1 HB 6 Wearable Sensor UWB 9 Wireless Communication 3.5–4.5 GHz
[14] Standing 1 1 RR 7 1 to 5 UWB 9 Radar -
[2,15] Sitting/Supine 1 3 HB 6 1 Quadrature Doppler Radar 2.4 GHz
[8] Standing 1 1 HB 6/RR 7 Doppler Radar 2.4 GHz
[1] Standing 1 1 HB 6/RR 7 1 CW 8 Radar 12 GHz/24 GHz
[9] Standing 1 1 HB 6/RR 7 0.55 UWB 9 Radar/Stepped Frequency CW 8 3 GHz
[16] Sitting 1 1 HB 6/RR 7 1 Doppler Radar 5.8 GHz
[11] Lying 1 1 HB 6 0.5 Radar 10, 15/18 GHz
[3] Simulation HB 6 Direct Conversion Doppler Radar 2.4 GHz
[17] Sitting 1 1 HB 6 Doppler Radar 5.8 GHz/20 GHz
[18] Simulation HB 6/RR 7 0.5, 1 & 2 Millimetre-Wave Doppler Radar 60 GHz
[19] Walking 1 2 Target Position 5 × 5 UWB 9 Radar 2.45 GHz
[20,21] Walking Multi HB 6/RR 7 8 × 8 Injection Locked I/Q Receivers 2.4 GHz
This Work Standing/walking 1 and 2 8 RR 6 0.3–1.5 CW 8 Radar 4 GHz

1 Positioning/Situation; 2 Number of subjects in same test; 3 Number of volunteers; 4 Signal type; 5 Sensing range; 6 Heartbeat; 7 Respiration rate; 8 Continuous wave; 9 Ultra-wideband.