Table 2. Summary of the Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) and the approximately unbiased (AU) tests.
P values were less than 0.05 in boldface. Log likelihood scores for the unconstrained analysis are given, as well as the difference in log likelihood scores between the unconstrained and the constraint topologies (∂).
| Ln likelihood | ∂ | SH | AU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nrITS analyses compared with constraint clades from atpB-rbcL and five-plastid genes analyses | ||||
| Unconstrained nrITS analysis | 9064.41715 | |||
| atpB-rbcL: ((A,B),((C,D),(E,(F,G))))* | 9072.49361 | 8.07647 | 0.2888 | 0.2248 |
| Plastid: ((C,D),((A,B),(F,(E,G)))) | 9074.76080 | 10.34366 | 0.2696 | 0.0785 |
| atpB-rbcL analyses compared with constraint clades from nrITS and five-plastid gene analyses | ||||
| Unconstrained atpB-rbcL analysis | 6927.72870 | |||
| nrITS: ((A,B),(C,(D,(F,(E,G)))))) | 6934.32995 | 6.60125 | 0.38310 | 0.2220 |
| Plastid I: ((C,D),((A,B),(E,(F,G)))) | 6931.46488 | 3.73618 | 0.53430 | 0.2301 |
| Plastid II: ((C,D),((A,B),(F,(E,G)))) | 6929.99927 | 2.27058 | 0.64490 | 0.5139 |
| nrITS + atpB-rbcL analyses compared with constraint clades from five-plastid gene analyses | ||||
| Unconstrained nrITS + atpB-rbcL analysis | 16844.75792 | |||
| Plastid I: ((C,D),((A,B),(E,(F,G)))) | 16862.85264 | 18.09472 | 0.2150 | 0.1165 |
| Plastid II: ((C,D),((A,B),(F,(E,G)))) | 16861.05424 | 16.29632 | 0.1137 | 0.0588 |
| Five-plastid-gene analyses compared with constraint clades from nrITS and atpB-rbcL analyses | ||||
| Unconstrained five-plastid-gene analysis | 23900.91280 | |||
| nrITS: ((A,B),(C,(D,(E,G)))) | 23911.26222 | 80.32224 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 |
| atpB-rbcL: ((A,B),((C,D),(E,G))) | 23981.23504 | 10.34943 | 0.3485 | 0.0296 |
*Notes: A, Anemoclema; B. Clematis s.l.; C. Hepatica; D, Anemone II; E. Anemone I; F, (Knowltonia, (Barneoudia, Oreithales)); G, Pulsatilla.