. 2017 Mar 31;12(3):e0174891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174891

Table 2. Summary of simulation home range models.

Simulation	Ave. Area (ha)	Ave. Edge Density (m/ha)	Ave. Patch Count	Area in river (%)	Point Inclusion (%)	AUC
GCM: Complete	83.05^a	202.77^a	18.90	5.00	96.30^a	0.998
Simulation 1	40.73^b	404.22^b	34.90	6.34	85.53^b	0.997
Simulation 2	71.15^a	252.83^a	24.10	4.64	94.28^a	0.998
a-LoCoH: Complete	61.41	134.79	2.30	0.33	89.78	0.841^a
Simulation 1	59.02	127.08	1.80	0.52	89.45	0.800^b
Simulation 2	62.31	123.66	2.20	0.21	89.54	0.821^a^,^b
T-LoCoH: Complete	70.51	122.46	1.50	0.72	89.70	0.807^a
Simulation 1	73.78	99.16	1.20	2.95	90.16	0.745^b
Simulation 2	72.93	108.63	1.60	1.20	89.85	0.794^a
BRB: Complete	80.89^a	108.99^a	5.10^a	2.98	93.88	0.969
Simulation 1	122.53^b	60.38^b	1.90^b	6.71	97.34	0.954
Simulation 2	81.25^a	111.08^a	5.50^a	3.04	93.98	0.968
Chi-sq value^*	123.24	205.73	213.05	111.56	98.01	310.11

Grid-cell method (GCM), adaptive local convex hull (a-LoCoH), adaptive time local convex hull (T-LoCoH) and biased random bridges (BRB). Simulation 1 simulated low fix rate (every 4 hours) and Simulation 2 simulated fix failures. (S6 Table for core range model results)

a,b: Pair-wise results from Tukey test; results significantly different from another (p<0.05) are indicated by a different letter, those with the same letter showed no significant difference

*Chi-square values for GLMM likelihood ratio test: for all tests, df = 11 and p <0.001.