Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jan;20(1):3–8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1022

Table 1.

Three categories of variants associated with breast cancer risk in van Zitteren et al. l

Gene Variant in van
Zitteren
Variant in
GWAS
literature
Allele
Frequency in
van Zitteren
Per Allele Odds
Ratio in van
Zitteren
Per Allele Odds
Ratio in GWAS
Literature
P value
in GWAS*
Power to
detect SNP in
GWAS*
Category 1: 18 SNPs found in GWAS
1p11 rs11249433 (T/C) same .3935 1.16 1.16 1×10-2
2q35 rs13387042 (G/A) same .500 1.11 1.12 2×10-10
3p24 SLC4A7 rs4973768 (C/T) same .470 1.12 1.11 6×10-7
5p12 rs2067980 (A/G) rs10941679 .160 1.08 1.19 3×10-3
5p12 rs7716600 (C/A) .2205 1.10
6q25 rs2046210 (G/A) same .3645 1.36 1.15 2×10-5
8q24 rs13281615 (T/C) same .40 1.06 1.08 2×10-5
Chr 9 rs1011970 (C/A) Turnbull * .1675 1.07 1.09 3×10-8
Chr 10 rs2380205 (G/A) Turnbull * .4295 0.95 0.94 5×10-7
Chr 10 rs10995190 (G/A) Turnbull * .149 0.84 0.86 5×10-15
Chr 10 rs704010 (G/A) Turnbull * .3945 1.11 1.07 4×10-9
Chr 11 rs614367 (G/A) Turnbull * .152 1.16 1.15 3×10-15
14q24 rs999737 (T/C) .2385 0.94
17q23 rs6504950 (G/A) .2700 1.04
FGFR2 rs2981582 (C/T) .379 1.18 1.26 4×10-31
LSP1 rs3817198 (T/C) .300 1.06 1.07 6×10-4
MAP3K1 rs889312 (A/C) .2795 1.13 1.12 5×10-9
TNRC9 rs3803662 (C/T) .2505 1.23 1.19 3×10-15

Category 2: 13 SNPs not found in GWAS

AKAP9 M463I (G/T) .366 1.08 0.087
CCND1 G870A .4595 1.12 0.641
CYP1B1 Val432Leu (G/C) .5445 1.60(het)
1.1(hom) 1.00
eNOS G894T .2265 1.22 (recess) .010
eNOS T(−786)C .8215 0.74 1.00
ESR1 rs3020314 (T/C) .3105 1.05 0.002
ESR2 rs4986938 (A/G) .361 0.94 0.017
FAS G(−1377)A .148 1.18 0.710
HER2 I655V (G/A) .1975 1.05 0.000
IGFBP3 A(−202)C .4895 1.03 0.000
NBS1 G8360C .320 0.97 0.000
WDR79 R68G C/G) .1205 1.08 0.004
XRCC1 R399Q (A/G) .660 1.12 (recess) 0.078

Category 3: 10 non-SNP variants

AR CAG repeat .539 0.61 (dom.)
CASP8 D302H .444 0.89 .88 0.14ns
CHEK2 1100delC .500 binary 2.40
Cyp19 TTTA10 0.024 binary 1.52
ERCC2 A751C .634 binary 1.13
GSTM1 Deletions .565 binary 1.10
GSTT1 Deletions .493 binary 1.11
MTHFR C677T .336 binary 1.04
TGFB1 L10P .5265 1.05
VDR Fok1 .146 binary 1.14
*

The GWAS was reported in (14).

Power calculations for category 2 SNPs (n=13) were performed at significance level 10−7 for the two-stage design of Turnbull et al (14). Power calculations for SNPs with recessive and co-dominant effects were based on a 2 degree of freedom test. For all other SNPs, the power calculations were done for the 1 degree of freedom trend test under a model that assumes that the relative odds are 1, OR, or OR2, for per allele odds ratio OR.