Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Feb 2;148(4):246–256.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.12.023

Table 4.

Crack-level characteristics of subjects with a cracked tooth, overall and according to whether cracked tooth was symptomatic.

Crack-level characteristic All Symptomatic
N Col1% N Row2%
At least 1 crack stained 2,410 81% 1,093 45%
No cracks were stained 565 19% 271 48%
P3 = 0.01
At least 1 crack detectable with explorer 2,065 69% 954 46%
No cracks were detectable with explorer 910 31% 410 45%
P = 0.3
At least 1 crack blocked transilluminated light 1,925 65% 940 49%
No cracks blocked transilluminated light 1,050 35% 424 40%
P = 0.006
At least 1 crack connect ed with a restoration 2,169 73% 1,013 47%
No cracks connected with a restoration 806 27% 352 44%
P = 0.5
At least 1 crack connect ed with another crack 140 5% 78 56%
No cracks connected with another crack 2,835 95% 1,286 45%
P = 0.2
At least 1 crack extended to root 327 11% 159 49%
No cracks extended to root 2,648 89% 1,205 46%
P = 0.045
At least 1 crack in horizontal direction 947 32% 453 48%
No cracks in horizontal direction 2,028 68% 911 45%
P = 0.1
At least 1 crack in vertical direction 2,766 93% 1,277 46%
No cracks in vertical direction 209 7% 88 42%
P = 0.08
At least 1 crack in oblique direction 291 10% 143 49%
No cracks in oblique direction 2,684 90% 1,221 45%
P = 0.8
Cracks are in more than 1 direction 434 15% 207 48%
All cracks in same direction 2,541 85% 1,157 46%
P = 0.1
Surfaces involved
At least 1 crack involved mesial 1,355 45% 641 47%
No crack involved mesial 1,620 54% 724 45%
P = 0.8
At least 1 crack involved occlusal 1,316 44% 626 48%
No crack involved occlusal 1,659 56% 738 44%
P = 0.3
At least 1 crack involved distal 1,497 50% 750 50%
No crack involved distal 1,478 50% 614 42%
P < 0.001
At least 1 crack involved facial 1,462 49% 661 45%
No crack involved facial 1,513 51% 703 46%
P = 0.9
At least 1 crack involved lingual 1,521 51% 727 48%
No crack involved lingual 1,454 49% 637 44%
P = 0.2
At least 1 crack involved more than 1 surface 1,063 36% 499 47%
No crack involved more than 1 surface 1,912 64% 865 45%
P = 0.4
1

Col: Column percents not summing to 100 due to rounding

2

Percent symptomatic within level of crack characteristic

3

Significance of differences in proportions symptomatic adjusted only for clustering using generalized estimating equations