Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 16;2017:3521261. doi: 10.1155/2017/3521261

Table 2.

Population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates, interindividual variability, and median parameter values (2.5–97.5%) of the nonparametric bootstrap replicates of the final pharmacokinetic model of propofol.

Parameters Estimates (RSE, %) CV (%) Median (2.5–97.5%)
V1  (L) = θ1 × (LBM/48) θ 1 17.5 (6.6) 32.9 17.4 (15.3–19.8)
V2  (L) 96.3 (5.9) 96.5 (84.4–108)
V3  (L) 1460 (3.2) 1430 (1015–1500)
 Cl  (L/min) 1.13 (3.7) 19.4 1.15 (1.06–1.28)
Q1  (L/min) 1.03 (4.6) 1.035 (0.944–1.13)
Q2  (L/min) 0.894 (4.2) 18.1 0.878 (0.789–0.955)
σ 0.0912 (6.5) 0.091 (0.079–0.102)

A log-normal distribution of interindividual random variability was assumed. Residual random variability was modeled using constant CV error model. Nonparametric bootstrap analysis was repeated 1,000 times. RSE: relative standard error = SE/mean × 100 (%). LBM: lean body mass calculated using the Janmahasatian formula [31]. V1: central volume of distribution (Vd), V2: rapid peripheral Vd, V3: slow peripheral Vd, Cl: metabolic clearance, Q1: intercompartmental clearance between central and rapid peripheral compartments, and Q2: intercompartmental clearance between central and slow peripheral compartments.