Table 3. Results of comparison between NTS group and control group regarding performance of treatment steps in both simulation scenarios.

Resuscitation scenario I
Treatment steps	NTS Group	Control Group	Significance
Call for help (yes/no)	Yes: 51.20% No: 48.80%	Yes: 35.30% No: 64.70%	χ2(1) = 1.94, p = .16
Return of spontaneous circulation (yes/no)	Yes: 39.50% No: 60.50%	Yes: 32.40% No: 67.60%	χ2(1) = 0.42, p = .52
Time until emergency call(s)	303.00 ± 39.90	335.80 ± 41.20	U = 120.00, z = -0.43, p = .68
Time until first defibrillation(s)	184.80 ± 8.60	178.40 ± 11.20	U = 698.50, z = .72, p = .47
Time until return of spontaneous circulation(s)	435.00 ± 26.80	466.00 ± 21.50	t(26) = 0.83, p = .41
Anaphylactic shock scenario II
Treatment steps	NTS Group	Control Group	Significance
Call for help (yes/no)	Yes: 46.50% No: 53.50%	Yes: 23.50% No: 76.50 %	χ2 (1) = 4.33, p = .04
Provided oxygen therapy via non-rebreathing mask (yes/no)	Yes: 93.00% No: 7.00%	Yes: 94.10% No: 5.90%	χ2 (1) = 0.04, p = .85
Adrenaline administration (yes/no)	Yes: 48.80% No: 51.20%	Yes: 64.70% No: 35.30%	χ2 (1) = 1.94, p = .16
Antihistamine administration (yes/no)	Yes: 69.80% No: 30.20%	Yes: 67.60% No: 32.40%	χ2 (1) = 0.04, p = .84
Initiation of blood volume expansion therapy (yes/no)	Yes: 55.80% No: 44.10%	Yes: 67.60% No: 32.40%	χ2 (1) = 1.12, p = .29
Patient´s condition improved (yes/no)	Yes: 39.50% No: 60.50%	Yes: 38.20% No: 61.80%	χ2 (1) = 0.01, p = .91
Time until emergency call(s)	318.40 ± 34.40	356.90 ± 49.90	t(27) = 0.60, p = .55
Time until oxygen administration(s)	152.30 ± 17.20	153.50 ± 18.90	U = 623.50, z = 0.41, p = .69
Time until adrenaline administration(s)	322.50 ± 20.80	336.60 ± 27.30	t(41)= 0.41, p = .69
Time until antihistamine administration(s)	247.20 ± 18.70	189.60 ± 13.90	U = 470.50, z = 2.26, p = .02
Time until initiation of blood volume expansion therapy(s)	219.00 ± 21.00	285.00 ± 21.00	U = 167.50, z = -2.31, p = .02
Time until patient´s condition improved(s)	273.10 ± 13.70	241.80 ± 14.30	t(28)= -1.56, p = .13