Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 7;36(7):904–918. doi: 10.15252/embj.201693907

Figure 2. PRR genes contribute to SUC2::CO‐mediated FT transcription.

Figure 2

  • A, B
    Comparison of CO (A) and FT (B) mRNA levels between WT and SUC2::CO.
  • C, D
    Effect of double, triple, and quadruple prr mutations on CO (C) and FT (D) mRNA in SUC2::CO background under LDs. The values of CO and FT mRNA levels were normalized to those of PP2a.
  • E
    Effect of prr mutations on flowering time in SUC2::CO background under LDs. For each line, 16 plants were used for flowering‐time measurement. Error bars indicate standard error. Statistical significance between SUC2::CO and each prr mutant, and among multiple prr mutants was calculated using Student's t‐test; *P < 0.01; n.s. P > 0.01.
Data information: For data in (A–D), error bars indicate standard error within two biological replicates and for each of these two technical replicates were performed.