. 2017 Feb 10;18(4):558–568. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642825

Table 1.

Yeast strains used in this study

Y141 W303 wild type

Y4950 MATa dcc1∆::LEU2

Y4951 MATa dcc1(WH3∆)‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y4325 MATa ctf18∆::TRP1

Y1235 MATa CTF18‐HA ₆ ::HIS3

Y4952 MATa dcc1∆::LEU CTF18‐HA6::KAN ^R

K7100 MATa URA3::tetOs HIS3::tetR‐GFP

Y4954 MATa ura3::3xURA3 tetO112, his3::HIS3 tetR‐GFP dcc1∆::LEU2

Y4955 MATa ura3::3xURA3 tetO112, his3::HIS3 tetR‐GFP dcc1(WH3∆)‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y5202 MATa ura3::3xURA3 tetO112, his3::HIS3 tetR‐GFP DCC1‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y5203 MATa ura3::3xURA3 tetO112, his3::HIS3 tetR‐GFP dcc1(WH2‐3∆)‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y5204 MATa ura3::3xURA3 tetO112, his3::HIS3 tetR‐GFP dcc1(WH1‐3∆)‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y5245 MATa CTF18‐HA ₆ ::HIS3 DCC1‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y5246 MATa CTF18‐HA ₆ ::HIS3 dcc1(WH3∆)‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y5247 MATa CTF18‐HA ₆ ::HIS3 dcc1(WH2‐3∆)‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1

Y5248 MATa CTF18‐HA ₆ ::HIS3 dcc1(WH1‐3∆)‐Pk ₉ ::TRP1