Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 22;7(4):562–576. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12203

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Through subsets of DANs, flies acquire BGAM. (A) Blockade of MBON‐γ1pedc‐induced aversive memory (BGAM) scheme. (B) Blocking synaptic outputs from a subset of DANs during odor presentation affected BGAM (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test comparing with MB112C/UAS‐Shi ts, n = 8–10). (C) Blocking synaptic outputs from PPL1‐γ1pedc during odor presentation did not affect BGAM (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test comparing with MB112C/UAS‐Shi ts, n = 7, 7, 8, 8). (D) Expression patterns of specific drivers. The gray scale represents subjectively determined intensities of termini in the MB. Partially modified from 39, 40. (B, C) All bar graphs are mean ± SEM, and dots represent individual trials. **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001, n.s.: P > 0.05.