Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 11;34(1):11–17. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63381

TABLE 3.

Differences between Edwards’ ITLs of training sessions with reduced and high portion of specific type of workouts (i.e., warm-up, conditioning, technical, tactical, game).

Training type (differences related to Edwards ITLs) Portion of training session Edwards
(AU)
RPE
(AU)
Session-RPE
(AU)
Edwards - session-RPE correlation indexes
ICC r 95% C.I. R2 P
Warm-up
(P>.05; ES=.2)
10-20% (n=45) 197±96
(66-402)
6.6±1.2
(4-9)
552±248
(231-1040)
.79 .87 .77-.93 .75 <.001
20-30% (n=21) 182±77
(39-355)
6.9±1.4
(4-9)
520±175
(90-832)
.76 .79 .54-.91 .62 <.001
Conditioning
((P=.022; ES=.8)
0-35% (n=54) 204±91
(66-402)
6.6±1.2
(4-9)
564±236
(231-1040)
.78 .85 .75-.91 .72 <.001
35-70% (n=12) 139±61
(39-264)
7.3±1.2
(4-9)
441±147
(90-600)
.72 .79 .39-.94 .63 .002
Technical
(P=.032; ES=.5)
0-21% (n=33) 169±84
(39-372)
6.8±1.4
(4-9)
498±203
(90-950)
.75 .79 .61-.89 .62 <.001
21-42% (n=33) 216±90
(75-402)
6.6±1.1
(4-8)
586±243
(231-1040)
.78 .89 .79-.94 .79 <.001
Tactical
(P=.013; ES=.4)
0-30% (n=27) 173±66
(39-355)
6.9±1.3
(4-9)
505±159
(90-832)
.64 .78 .57-.89 .60 <.001
30-60% (n=39) 206±102
(66-402)
6.6±1.2
(4-9)
567±263
(231-1040)
.79 .87 .76-.93 .75 <.001
Game
(P=.004; ES=.5)
0-13% (n=49) 202±95
(66-402)
6.6±1.2
(4-9)
563±244
(231-1040)
.79 .86 .76-.92 .74 <.001
13-26% (n=17) 164±66
(39-264)
7.0±1.4
(4-9)
480±157
(90-780)
.75 .77 .46-.91 .59 <.001

Note: Data are means and standard deviations (and range) of Edwards’, RPE, and session-RPE parameters (arbitrary units, AU) in relation to each type and portion of training session, and corresponding correlations between session-RPE and Edwards’ values (ICC, r, 95% C.I., R2, and P values).