Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 16;35(Suppl 1):S24–S32. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001241

TABLE 2.

Summary statistics for association of age of onset of T2D for 25 independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms in Caucasians study participants from ADVANCE. Genome-wide association studies were done for all study participants (n = 3409 combined group) and separately for Celtic (n = 2307) and Slavic (n = 1102) individuals stratified by ethnic origin, which is determined by principal component analysis. Selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms for all groups are associated to age at diagnosis of diabetes with P value less than 1 × 10−5

Celtic Slavic Combinedc
SNP ID Chr Position (bp, hg19) RA Locusa P value RAF% Effect sizeb P value RAF% Effect sizeb P value RAF% Effect sizeb
SNPs that are significantly associated in both Celtic and Slavic genetic profiles and that increase in significance in combined groupc
rs34428389 3 52 894 142 A TMEM110, MIR8064, SFMBT1 3.3 × 10−4 19.1 −2.00 8.9 × 10−3 18.4 −1.43 8.1 × 10−6 18.9 −2.47
rs17447640 4 42 555 811 G ATP8A1, SHISA3, GRXCR1 1.1 × 10−5 13.9 −2.15 5.6 × 10−2 15.7 −0.98 1.5 × 10−6 14.5 −2.39
rs11298745 7 18 548 252 Del HDAC9, MIR1302–6, TWIST1 2.3 × 10−3 90.5 −1.26 4.6 × 10−5 90.0 −1.73 1.6 × 10−6 90.3 −2.01
rs34620785 8 103 452 308 A UBR5, ODF1 1.6 × 10−4 88.4 −1.71 1.7 × 10−3 84.4 −1.61 1.6 × 10−6 87.1 −2.27
rs76703216 10 9 512 026 G LOC101928272 3.8 × 10−5 94.1 −1.37 3.5 × 10−2 96.2 −0.57 3.6 × 10−6 94.7 −1.46
rs35372009 14 38 782 341 Del CLEC14A, LINC00639 1.1 × 10−2 42.5 −1.78 9.0 × 10−6 39.5 −3.07 3.3 × 10−6 41.6 −3.24
rs148077446 16 77 310 608 Del SYCE1L, ADAMTS18 1.6 × 10−4 28.7 −2.42 5.0 × 10−3 31.9 −1.85 5.7 × 10−6 29.7 −2.93
SNPs that are only significantly associated in Celtic profile RAF% AF% AF%
rs12743974 1 67 708 357 A IL23R, C1ORF141, IL12RB2 5.3 × 10−6 41.9 −3.18 3.8 × 10−1 41.8 0.62 1.2 × 10−3 41.8 −2.25
rs12736701 1 77 815 425 C AK5, PIGK, ZZZ3 7.6 × 10−6 93.4 −1.57 8.4 × 10−1 93.9 0.07 3.2 × 10−4 93.6 −1.24
rs7412314 1 171 287 252 T FMO4, FMO1, TOP1P1 4.3 × 10−6 73.3 −2.88 6.5 × 10−1 69.8 −0.30 6.3 × 10−5 72.1 −2.53
rs11099942 4 155 132 707 T SFRP2, DCHS2 4.3 × 10−6 6.4 −1.59 6.7 × 10−1 5.1 0.13 1.7 × 10−4 5.9 −1.26
rs9502478 6 6 593 695 T LY86-AS1, F13A1 4.3 × 10−6 17.3 −2.46 6.3 × 10−1 16.0 −0.25 3.2 × 10−5 16.9 −2.20
rs2107167 7 109 590 911 A EIF3IP1 8.0 × 10−6 13.7 −2.17 9.6 × 10−1 9.6 −0.02 4.1 × 10−5 12.4 −1.91
rs10973627 9 37 971 389 C SHB, SLC25A51, ALDH1B1 4.1 × 10−6 87.7 −2.14 6.4 × 10−1 89.2 −0.21 9.9 × 10−6 88.2 −2.02
rs113932007 11 115 491 436 Del CADM1, LINC00900 5.9 × 10−7 65.1 −3.37 5.1 × 10−1 64.5 −0.45 8.8 × 10−6 64.9 −3.00
rs10512488 17 40 963 904 G BECN1, CNTD1, MIR6781 3.1 × 10−6 74.0 −2.90 2.9 × 10−1 72.2 −0.67 9.5 × 10−6 73.4 −2.77
SNPs that are only significantly associated in Slavic profile AF% RAF% AF%
rs340841 1 214 124 470 C PROX1-AS1, LINC00538, PROX1 7.9 × 10−1 45.9 0.19 8.6 × 10−6 52.8 −3.14 2.5 × 102 48.1 −1.59
rs12714314 2 1 943 617 C MYT1L, PXDN, MYT1L-AS1 9.3 × 10−1 75.8 0.05 3.4 × 10−6 72.8 −2.92 1.9 × 10−2 74.9 −1.44
rs58383906 3 29 246 181 C LINC00693, RBMS3-AS3 3.3 × 10−1 51.5 −0.68 2.8 × 10−6 50.3 −3.32 6.9 × 10−4 51.1 −2.40
rs13166103 5 57 742 202 C LOC101928569, PLK2 3.5 × 10−1 81.3 0.51 4.1 × 10−6 79.8 −2.61 9.4 × 10−2 80.8 −0.93
rs12188216 5 166 425 736 G CTB-7E3.1, TENM2 2.9 × 10−1 10.7 −0.46 9.7 × 10−6 9.7 −1.85 1.7 × 10−3 10.3 −1.35
rs9384193 6 154 554 249 C OPRM1, CNKSR3 8.7 × 10−1 36.3 0.11 8.8 × 10−6 36.3 −3.02 2.7 × 10−2 36.3 −1.50
rs11060464 12 130 097 850 G TMEM132D, LOC101927735, LOC100190940 5.4 × 10−1 70.9 0.39 3.7 × 10−6 73.1 −2.90 6.0 × 10−2 71.6 −1.20
rs1754680 14 38 848 003 A CLEC14A, LINC00639 2.3 × 10−2 59.4 −1.54 8.3 × 10−6 57.4 −3.17 4.8 × 10−5 58.7 −2.85
rs13043901 20 52 170 783 A LOC101927770, TSHZ2, ZNF217 3.3 × 10−1 75.3 −0.60 5.0 × 10−6 76.5 −2.74 4.2 × 10−4 75.7 −2.14

RA, risk allele; RAF, risk allele frequency; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

aIf gene is in bold, SNP lies within the gene.

bThe effect size (ES) is determined by the β, MAF, and standard error using the equation described in literature [37].

cAssociation is considered replicated in two independent samples when P values are nominally significant for each of Celtic and Slavic samples and are more significant for combined sample.