Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 22;14(128):20170001. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0001

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) The shapes obtained from the solution of our model described by equations (2.1)–(2.7) which are qualitatively similar to the shapes displayed in figure 1. (1) Negative gravitropism observed for computed shapes with Inline graphic and Inline graphic. (2) Axially varying gravitropic orientation with increase in shoot length for Inline graphic and Inline graphic. (3) Axially varying curvature change with curvature reversal, observed in our model for Inline graphic and Inline graphic. (4) Apparent positive gravitropism for Inline graphic and Inline graphic. (b) Morphospace for shoot shapes as a function of the sensitivity parameter Inline graphic, and the elasticity parameter Inline graphic. We note that for Inline graphic, there are no qualitative differences from what is shown—when Inline graphic, the shoot turns without any inflection points, while when Inline graphic, it can have one or more points of inflection. A comparison with figure 1 shows that we can capture a range of different forms in terms of these two parameters. The colour map indicates the L2 norm of the shoot curvature Inline graphic. (Online version in colour.)