Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2016 Sep;27(5):690–696. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000509

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Bayesian Shared Component Models with Spatial Conditionally Autoregressive Priors or Nonspatial Priors for the Random Effects Components

Spatial Nonspatial
Fixed components
 Exp(αb): intercept (black) 1.8 (1.8–1.9)   1.9 (1.8–1.9)  
 Exp(αw): intercept (white) 0.86 (0.85–0.87) 0.85 (0.83–0.86)
δ: scaling parametera 0.62 (0.54–0.69) 0.62 (0.57–0.67)
Random effects
σνi2: black-specific heterogeneity 0.03 (0.02–0.04) 0.02 (0.01–0.03)
σui2×δ2: shared variation (black) 0.01 (0.00–0.01) 0.01 (0.00–0.01)
σui2/δ2: shared variation (white) 0.06 (0.05–0.06) 0.07 (0.06–0.07)
 Proportion shared variation (black) 0.24 (0.14–0.36) 0.32 (0.23–0.42)
Model deviance information criteria 23900 25628

Values in parentheses represent the 95% credible intervals of the estimates. The OpenBUGS code to estimate the model parameters can be found in the eAppendix (http://links.lww.com/EDE/B58).

a

The differential scaling of the shared random effect, vi, for black and white infants is represented by δ.