Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;12(4):e0174710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174710

Table 3. Linear regression results of the association of trunk lean mass and kyphosis.

Trunk Lean Mass Debrunner β (95% CI) p Flexicurve β (95% CI) p Blocks β (95% CI) p Cobb β (95% CI) p
Unadjusted -0.17(-0.84; 0.50) .62 0.11(-0.17; 0.39) .42 -0.03(-0.11; 0.05) .47 0.67 (-0.03;1.36) .06
Adjusted for age & sex 0.15 (-0.84; 1.14) .77 0.17(-0.23; 0.57) .40 0.06(-0.04; 0.17) .24 0.66 (-0.35;1.68) .20
Adjusted for age, sex, & weight 1.47 (-0.26; 3.20) .10 0.57(-0.12; 1.26) .10 0.17(-0.00; 0.35) .05 1.69 (-0.05;3.43) .06
Adjusted for age, sex, weight, & hip BMD 1.93 (0.15; 3.72) .03 0.83 (0.14; 1.53) .02 0.21(0.03; 0.40) .02 2.07 (0.31;3.82) .02

*Trunk Lean Mass units: per kilogram decrease