Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):e004731. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004731

Figure 4. Regional circumferential strain showed preservation of contractile performance in the EHM group compared to control.

Figure 4

Regional function assessed from cardiac MRI included (A) regional strain in the scar region, (C) wall thickening in the scar region, and (E) regional strain in the remote zone. Significant differences between both EHM and control groups were detected for (B) changes in regional strain in the scar region, but not for changes in other parameters or regions such as (D) change in wall thickening or (F) change in regional strain of the remote zone. Ecc: negative peak of circumferential strain. * P<0.05.