|
| |
| Outcome | Effectiveness |
|
| |
| Decreased research misconduct | No evidence,1 but access to data is limited by what information becomes public. Even if more data were available, a significant impact is unlikely since the classroom appears to be less important than the research environment.3 |
|
| |
| Decreased RCR disputes or misunderstandings | No evidence, but it is plausible that increased awareness of issues will diminish the risk of disputes and misunderstandings. |
|
| |
| Increased knowledge and/or skills | Evidence is nominal. Although statistically significant improvements have been reported (e.g., for ethical decision-making), the magnitude of the impact of teaching RCR on knowledge and skills is typically modest, absent, or negative.1,4 |
|
| |
| Positive attitudes, continued learning, and culture of RCR |
Individual impact: Evidence is promising, but must allow for different individuals experiencing different impacts (e.g., improved ethical decision-making skill or increased awareness of authorship standards).5 Group impact: Some evidence suggests successful fostering of a culture of integrity based on the extent to which trainees continue conversations outside the classroom (Kalichman and colleagues, unpublished observations). |
|
| |
| Evidence is unclear; some evidence for effectiveness. | |