Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2016 Oct 3;78(3):950–962. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26481

Table 2.

Fat fraction. Conventional Cartesian imaging shows apparent error in fat fraction estimation due to the artefactual phase caused by mis-aligned k-spaces between gradient echoes. SNR was measured with separated water in all tubes.

SNR 0% fat (%) 5% fat (%) 10% fat (%) 15% fat (%) 20% fat (%) 30% fat (%) 40% fat (%) 50% fat (%)
Cartesian 55.3 10.4 ±13.2 12.2 ±21.5 13.0 ±2.3 13.8 ±3.1 13.2 ±2.8 21.5 ±2.1 34.6 ±1.6 47.3 ±1.8
Ramp sampling with nominal trajectory 45.9 37.9 ±1.9 42.3 ±1.7 46.7 ±1.9 50.4 ±1.8 48.1 ±2.0 43.5 ±2.1 42.6 ±1.7 48.2 ±1.7
Ramp sampling with GIRF 56.1 5.9 ±2.1 6.2 ±2.0 9.9 ±2.4 14.8 ±2.6 19.7 ±2.6 29.0 ±1.6 39.6 ±1.5 50.6 ±1.7
Ramp sampling with SPI-based measurement 56.4 5.4 ±2.1 6.2 ±2.2 10.3 ±2.3 15.3 ±3.0 19.8 ±2.5 29.1 ±1.7 39.8 ±1.5 50.3 ±1.8