Table 4.

Simulation results: survival outcome

Scenario 3
p	Method	Correct rate (sd)	Model size (sd)	TP (sd)
50	Proposed	92.3% (7.6%)	2.36 (1.43)	1.72 (0.47)
	Proposed-cw	93.5% (5.0%)	2.62 (1.68)	1.84 (0.36)
	VT-rsf	94.4% (4.8%)	2.33 (1.17)	1.89 (0.32)
	Lasso-cox	78.8% (4.4%)	9.95 (4.88)	1.84 (0.37)
	optsel-ipcw	77.9% (6.3%)	5.59 (4.54)	1.62 (0.49)
500	Proposed	87.6% (11.1%)	1.87 (1.44)	1.39 (0.57)
	Proposed-cw	89.6% (6.4%)	2.00 (1.28)	1.45 (0.50)
	VT-rsf	87.0% (8.1%)	2.13 (1.91)	1.41 (0.49)
	Lasso-cox	73.3% (7.2%)	14.10 (14.18)	1.16 (0.51)
	optsel-ipcw	69.3% (9.2%)	10.50 (6.02)	1.11 (0.47)
Scenario 4
p	Method	Correct rate (sd)	Model size (sd)	TP (sd)
50	Proposed	86.6% (6.5%)	1.22 (0.56)	1.00 (0.00)
	Proposed-cw	79.6% (13.6%)	2.07 (2.46)	0.96 (0.19)
	VT-rsf	69.1% (11.1%)	5.41 (4.13)	0.95 (0.22)
	Lasso-cox	51.9% (1.1%)	16.75 (16.93)	0.38 (0.49)
	optsel-ipcw	51.8% (1.2%)	14.11 (15.89)	0.32 (0.47)
500	Proposed	84.9% (9.3%)	1.30 (1.40)	0.97 (0.17)
	Proposed-cw	72.4% (17.5%)	2.72 (3.46)	0.73 (0.44)
	VT-rsf	60.9% (11.3%)	6.18 (5.22)	0.61 (0.49)
	Lasso-cox	52.2% (1.1%)	58.04 (62.13)	0.18 (0.38)
	optsel-ipcw	52.5% (1.1%)	53.74 (43.52)	0.17(0.35)