Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 8;6(3):e12. doi: 10.1038/emi.2016.142

Table 1. Comparison of rRT-PCR influenza A positive samples by variable.

Variable Collected samples, no. (%)a Influenza A-positive samples, no. (%)b P-valuesc
Sample type
 Oropharyngeal 8081 (38.3%) 2689 (33.3%) <0.001
 Cloacal 4609 (21.8%) 857 (18.6%)  
 Environmental (fecal) 6395 (30.3%) 861 (13.5%)  
 Environmental (water) 2011 (9.5%) 653 (32.5%)  
Species
 Chickens 14 213 (67.4%) 3276 (23.0%) <0.001
 Ducks 3426 (16.2%) 844 (24.6%)  
 Geese 58 (0.3%) 11 (19.0%)  
 Pigeons 1165 (5.5%) 173 (14.8%)  
 Quail 2234 (10.6%) 756 (33.8%)  
Bird type
 Domestic 20 958 (99.3%) 5043 (24.1%) <0.001
 Pet 138 (0.7%) 17 (12.3%)  
Bird health status
 Dead 8 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) <0.001
 Healthy 20 952 (99.3%) 5055 (24.1%)  
 Sick 10 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)  
 Undetermined 126 (0.6%) 5 (4.0%)  
Domestic bird location
 Backyard 225 (1.1%) 5 (2.2%) <0.001
 Farm 6202 (29.4%) 597 (9.6%)  
 LBM 14 669 (69.5%) 4458 (30.4%)  
Market type
 Retail 11 137 (75.9%) 3332 (29.9%) 0.027
 Wholesale 3532 (24.1%) 1126 (31.9%)  

Abbreviation: live bird market, LBM.

Influenza A positive samples by rRT-PCR and the total number of samples for each variable collected from LBMs and farms in Bangladesh from 2008 to 2016. The numbers and percentages shown under the ‘collected samples' column represent the actual number and percentage of that category out of the total number of samples for the specified variables. The numbers and percentages shown under the ‘influenza A-positive samples' column represent the actual number and percentage of that category out of the total number of samples for the specified variables. P-values shown are based on a statistical significance of P<0.05, comparing the rates of influenza A positivity across variable categories.

a

Percentage of total samples collected.

b

Of samples within category.

c

By χ2-test comparing positive rates across variable categories.