Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Apr 4;7:45936. doi: 10.1038/srep45936

A UPF0118 family protein with uncharacterized function from the moderate halophile Halobacillus andaensis represents a novel class of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter

Ping Dong 1, Lidan Wang 1, Na Song 1, Lina Yang 1, Jin Chen 1, Mingxue Yan 1, Huiwen Chen 1, Rui Zhang 1, Jincheng Li 1, Heba Abdel-motaal 1, Juquan Jiang 1,a
PMCID: PMC5379678  PMID: 28374790

Abstract

In this study, genomic DNA was screened from Halobacillus andaensis NEAU-ST10-40T by selection in Escherichia coli KNabc lacking three major Na+/H+ antiporters. One gene designated upf0118 exhibiting Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity was finally cloned. Protein alignment showed that UPF0118 shares the highest identity of 81.5% with an unannotated gene encoding a protein with uncharacterized protein function belonging to UPF0118 family from H. kuroshimensis, but shares no identity with all known specific Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter genes or genes with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. Growth test, western blot and Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport assay revealed that UPF0118 as a transmembrane protein exhibits pH-dependent Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that UPF0118 clustered with all its homologs belonging to UPF0118 family at a wide range of 22–82% identities with the bootstrap value of 92%, which was significantly distant with all known specific single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and single-gene proteins with the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. Taken together, we propose that UPF0118 should represent a novel class of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the functional analysis of a protein with uncharacterized protein function as a representative of UPF0118 family containing the domain of unknown function, DUF20.

In prokaryotes, Na+/H+ antiporters are ubiquitous secondary transporters catalyze the efflux of intracellular alkali cations in exchange for external protons, which play a vital role in reducing the cytoplasmic concentration of toxic alkali cations and supporting Na+-dependent intracellular pH homeostasis under alkaline conditions1,2,3,4. They were also designated Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters, due to Na+/H+ antiport activity, together with Li+/H+ antiport activity. Since the gene ant was found for the first time to affect the Na+/H+ antiport activity of Escherichia coli and therefore designated nhaA5, Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter genes or the genes with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity have been increasingly cloned and functionally identified in E. coli mutants KNabc or EP432, which lack major antiporters6,7. In present, Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters are divided into two main categories based on the number of encoding genes: one category of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters are encoded by a single gene such as nhaA6,8, nhaB9,10, nhaC11, nhaD8,11,12,13,14,15,16, nhaE17, napA18, nhaP19, nhaG20 or nhaH21, all of which are grouped into the monovalent Cation/Proton Antiporter 1 (CPA-1) family with the exception of NapA sharing the high identity with K+/H+ antiporters that are grouped into the CPA-2 family22. The other category containing six or seven subunits are encoded by a multi-cistronic operon with the different designations such as mrp2,23,24,25, mnh26, pha27,28,29,30 or sha31, which are grouped into the CPA-3 family due to its distinctive multigene structural properties22. In addition to two above mentioned main categories, other genes with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity were also continually shown to exhibit Na+/H+ antiport activity. For example, ChaA was previously reported to have properties of a Ca2+/H+ antiporter and a Na+/H+ antiporter31, and was later characterized to also be a K+/H+ antiporter32. MleN was identified to be a malic−2-2H+/Na+-lactate−1 antiporter, which exhibits Na+/H+ antiport activity coupled with malate/lactate antiport activity33. An unique tetracycline/H+ antiporter TetB(L)34 and a primary Na+ pump Nap35 were reported to possess Na+/H+ antiport activity. The E. coli multidrug resistance (MDR) protein MdfA with a broad-specificity MDR phenotype36 was also characterized to exhibit Na+(K+)/H+ antiport activity37. Putative paired small multidrug resistance family proteins PsmrAB, the homolog of YvdSR, were characterized to function mainly as a novel two-component Na+/H+ antiporter38.

In our recent study39, strain NEAU-ST10-40T, a moderate halophile isolated from Na2CO3-type saline and alkaline soils in Anda City, China was identified to represent a novel species Halobacillus, Halobacillus andaensis, with the growth range of NaCl concentrations of 3–15% (w/v) (optimum, 8%, w/v) and pH 7.0–9.0 (optimum, pH 8.0), and thus this novel halophilic strain from unique saline-alkaline conditions could have developed sophisticated mechanisms to maintain its intracellular steady osmotic and ionic state. Since almost all halophilic microorganisms have the ability to expel Na+ from the interior of the cells using Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters40,41, it is very likely that important (even novel) Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter genes exist in this novel strain NEAU-ST10-40T, a moderate halophile which can tolerate up to 15% (w/v) NaCl.

In order to obtain as many (especially novel) Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter genes as possible, genomic DNA was screened from H. andaensis NEAU-ST10-40T for the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter gene by selection in E. coli KNabc lacking three major Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters. Of several screened resultant clones, to our surprise, one gene designated upf0118 showed the highest identity of 81.5% with an unannotated gene encoding a protein with uncharacterized protein function belonging to UPF0118 family from H. kuroshimensis, but showed no identity with all known specific Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter genes or genes with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. In this study, we reported the cloning and characterization of upf0118 and propose that this novel protein belonging to UPF0118 family should represents a novel class of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter.

Results

Cloning and sequence analysis of the gene with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity

As shown in Fig. 1, a 4.4-kb DNA fragment was obtained from Sau3AI-digested genomic DNA from strain NEAU-ST10-40T using E. coli KNabc. The recombinant plasmid designated pUC-DP61 (pUC18 carrying this DNA fragment) enabled E. coli KNabc cells to grow on the LBK plate containing 0.2 M NaCl. Sequence analysis showed that one C-terminus truncated ORF (ORF1) and three intact ORFs (ORF2-4) are included in this DNA fragment, each of which is preceded by a respective promoter-like sequence and a respective Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence (Fig. 1). C-terminus truncated ORF1 has the highest identity of 76.0% with a putative glycine betaine transporter (accession.version No. EKE30543.1) from Salimicrobium jeotgali, ORF2 has the highest identity of 73.0% with a hypothetical protein (accession.version No. WP_ 026577524.1) belonging to YugN-like family from an uncharacterized Bacillaceae species, ORF3 has the highest identity of 81.5% with a protein (accession.version No. WP_027954082.1, the corresponding gene is unannotated in its genome) belonging to UPF0118 family with uncharacterized protein function from H. kuroshimensis, and ORF4 has the highest identity of 63.0% with a putative N-acetyltransferase (accession.version No. WP_035545378.1) from Halobacillus sp. BBL2006.

Figure 1. The mapping of the inserted DNA fragment in the recombinant plasmid pUC-DP61 and subcloning strategy of the gene upf0118.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

One C-terminus truncated ORF and three intact ORFs are included in a 4.4-kb DNA fragment inserted into the recombinant plasmid pUC-DP61, each of which is preceded by a respective promoter-like sequence and a respective Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence. A predicted promoter sequence (−35 region and −10 region) and Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence, the initiation codon TTG of ORF3 designated UPF0118 (Genbank accession No. KY231907), the enzymatic site of SalI and EcoRI are underlined. The stop codon TAA of ORF3 is indicated by the asterisk and a possible terminator following ORF3 indicated by inverted solid arrows. UPF0118 was subcloned, together with its promoter-like and SD sequences, into SalI- and EcoRI-digested pUC18 through digestion by the same two restriction enzymes and ligation.

Among the above mentioned four ORFs, ORF1 is incomplete and therefore can’t restore the growth of E. coli KNabc in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl. As for the other three intact ORFs, ORF3, an uncharacterized function protein belonging to UPF0118 family, is predicted to be the sole transmembrane protein composed of six putative transmembrane segments (TMSs) including TMS I (10–30), TMS II (60–80), TMS III (161–181), TMS IV (217–237), TMS V (252–272), TMS VI (319–339) (Fig. 2). Hereafter, the gene encoding this protein was designated upf0118 in order to describe the following identification. The deduced amino acid sequence of UPF0118 consists of 352 residues with a calculated molecular weight of 39, 611.01 Dalton and a pI of 9.76. Among the 352 residues of UPF0118, 225 residues were hydrophobic, indicating that UPF0118 is of low polarity. Based on the above sequence analysis, ORF3 is the most likely to exhibit Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, since Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters must be transmembrane proteins of low polarity.

Figure 2. Alignment of UPF0118 with its most closely related holomogs clustered within the neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The ten closest homologs with 58–82% identities clustered within the neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree with the bootstrap value of 100% (Fig. 3) were selected to show the conserved motifs and amino acid residues. Acession.version numbers are shown in the neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of Fig. 3. Shading homology corresponds to 100% (black), >75% (grey), ≥50% (lightgrey) and <50% (white) amino acid identity, respectively. The six putative transmembrane segments are marked with bold lines above the alignment. The five highly conserved motifs are highlighted with the open rectangles in the consensus sequence.

Identification of ORFs with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity

In order to identify the exact ORF with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, UPF0118 with its promoter-like and SD sequences was at first subcloned into SalI- and EcoRI-digested pUC18 through digestion by the same two restriction enzymes and ligation (Fig. 1) and chemically transformed into E. coli KNabc to test if its presence could restore the growth of E. coli KNabc in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl. Also, ORF2 or ORF4 was tested to check whether either of them could restore the growth of E. coli KNabc in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl, respectively, through the similar methods using the suitable restriction enzymatic digestion, ligation and transformation. As a result, the expression of only upf0118, but ORF2 or ORF4 not, enabled E. coli KNabc to grow in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl. Therefore, UPF0118 is exactly likely to possess Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. The resultant plasmid containing subcloned upf0118 with its promoter-like and SD sequences was therefore designated pUC-UPF0118.

Phylogenetic analysis and protein alignment between UPF0118 and its homologs, together with identified specific single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and single-gene proteins with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity.

To show whether this novel protein indeed belongs to UPF0118 family and whether it shares phylogenetic relationship with identified specific single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and other single-gene proteins with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, phylogenetic analysis based on neighbour-joining algorithm was carried out. For the construction of phylogenetic tree, nine closest homologs with 60–82% identities, nine closer homologs with 49–59% identities and nine distant homologs with 22–42% identities, together with all representatives of known specific single-gene Na+/H+ antiporters and other single-gene proteins with the Na+/H+ antiport activity were selected. As shown in Fig. 3, UPF0118 clustered with all its homologs belonging to UPF0118 family with the bootstrap value of 92%, which was significantly distant with all known specific single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and single-gene proteins with the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity.

Figure 3. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of selected homologs of Halobacillus andaensis UPF0118, together with known Na+/H+ antiporters.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

For the construction of phylogenetic tree, nine closest homologs with 60–82% identities, nine closer homologs with 49–59% identities, nine distant homologs with 22–42% identities, together with all representatives of known specific single-gene Na+/H+ antiporters and single-gene proteins with the Na+/H+ antiport activity were selected. Accession.version numbers of selected homologs were shown in the parenthesis. Open diamond stands for putative UPF0118 family proteins; filled diamond stands for UPF0118 identified in this study; filled circle stands for known specific single-gene Na+/H+ antiporters; filled triangle stands for other single-gene proteins with the Na+/H+ antiport activity. Bootstrap values ≥70% (based on 1000 replications) are shown at branch points. Bar, 0.2 substitutions per amino acid residue position. UPF0118 and its most closely related holomogs clustered with the bootstrap value of 99% marked with the asterisk were used for protein alignment in Fig. 2.

UPF0118 was also aligned with its ten closest homologs clustered within the neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree with the bootstrap value of 100%. In addition to the homolog with the highest identity of 81.5% from H. kuroshimensis, UPF0118 has the respective identities of 79.3%, 78.7%, 78.7%, 77.8%, 69.0%, 67.3%, 65.1%, 63.1% and 58.4% with the homologs from H. alkaliphilus (accession.version No. SFF94744.1), H. halophilus (accession.version No. WP_014643083.1), H. dabanensis (accession.version No. WP_075036522.1), H. karajensis (accession.version No. SEH70700.1), Virgibacillus sp. SK-1 (accession.version No. WP_053219791.1), Sediminibacillus albus (accession.version No. SDJ74814.1), Thalassobacillus cyri (accession.version No. SEB17075.1), Pontibacillus chungwhensis (accession.version No. WP_036781630.1) and P. marinus (accession.version No. WP_027448163.1) (Fig. 2). At a wide range of 58–82% identities, five highly conserved motifs including “LVYLIALFLFMLE”, “GFLKAQFLVS”, “PIIGSI”, “LLAIRRTVEPKVMGRHIGLSPLATLIAM” and “IAFNSAKEAGII” were found among all the selected homologs (Fig. 2). It should be noted that UPF0118 was also aligned with all known specific Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and proteins with the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, but showed no identity with each of them.

Resistance of UPF0118 to NaCl, LiCl and pH

To test the ability of UPF0118 to induce salt tolerance, E. coli KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 and KNabc/pUC18 were grown in LBK medium containing 0–0.4 M NaCl or 0–30 mM LiCl. As shown in Fig. 4A, E. coli KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 could grow in the presence of 0.3 M NaCl, but E. coli KNabc/pUC18 as a negative control could not survive in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl. Also, E. coli KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 could grow only in the presence of 30 mM LiCl, but E. coli KNabc/pUC18 as a negative control could not survive in the presence of 5 mM LiCl (Fig. 4B). In order to analyze the resistance of UPF0118 to alkaline pH, E. coli KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 and KNabc/pUC18 were grown in the LBK medium at the pH values from 7.0 to 8.5. As shown in Fig. 4C, the growth of E. coli KNabc/pUC18 was greatly reduced under alkaline conditions, especially at pH 8.0, compared with that at pH 7.0, whereas the expression of upf0118 conferred E. coli KNabc cells the capability to grow under alkaline conditions. For the more detailed analysis of the resistance of UPF0118 to NaCl, LiCl and pH, the growth cuvres of E. coli KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 and KNabc/pUC18 in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl or 5 mM LiCl, or at pH 7.0, pH 7.5 were plotted on a semilogarithmic scale. As shown in Fig. S1, the expression of upf0118 conferred E. coli KNabc cells the significant tolerance to 0.2 M NaCl or 5 mM LiCl, and an alkline pH resistance at 7.5.

Figure 4. Salt tolerance and alkaline pH resistance of E. coli strains KNabc.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

For the salt tolerance test, 1% overnight cultures of KNabc transformant cells carrying the empty vector pUC18 (white column), pET-22b (lightgrey column), pUC-UPF0118 (darkgrey column) or pET-22b-UPF0118 (black column) grown at 37 °C in the LBK medium at pH 7.0 were innoculated into fresh LBK medium at pH 7.0, to which NaCl (A) or LiCl (B) was added at indicated concentrations, followed by incubation at 37 °C. To test the effect of pH (C) on cell growth, 1% overnight cultures of the above mentioned KNabc transformant cells grown at 37 °C in the LBK medium at pH 7.0 were innoculated into fresh LBK medium containing 50 mM NaCl at indicated pHs adjusted by adding the Hepes-Tris buffer at the final concentration of 100 mM, followed by incubation at 37 °C. The above mentioned cell growth was ended after 24 h and monitored turbidimetrically at 600 nm. Each data point represents the average of three independent determinations.

Detection and localization of UPF0118 by western blot

For the detection and localization of UPF0118, the expression vector pET-22b-UPF0118 was constructed and the sole ORF of upf0118 gene was fused in frame with an N-terminal His6 tag. The growth test showed that E. coli KNabc/pET-22b-UPF0118 exhibited the similar tolerance to the salts and alkaline pH resistance (Fig. 4), compared with KNabc/pUC-UPF0118. Also, sequencing analysis revealed that UPF0118 succeeded in being fused in frame with an N-terminal His6 tag. Therefore, pET-22b-UPF0118 can be used for the following western blot experiments. As shown in Fig. 5, the expression of UPF0118 was detected in the total protein extract, membrane protein fractions and cytoplasmic protein ones from E. coli KNabc/pET-22b-UPF0118, but not in those from KNabc/pET-22b.

Figure 5. Western blot detection and localization of UPF0118 in Escherichia coli.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

For the detection and localization of UPF0118, E. coli KNabc carrying pET-22b-UPF0118 and the empty vector pET-22b (as a negative control) were grown in LBK medium to OD600 between 0.4 and 0.6 at 37 °C, followed by induction by the addition of isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside to a final concentration of 1 mM at 28 °C for an additional 6 h and then harvested by centrifugation at 5, 000 g, 4 °C for 10 min and washed three times with Tris-HCl (10 mM Tris -HCl, pH 7.5). The membrane protein fractions, cytoplasmic protein ones and total protein extract from E. coli KNabc/pET-22b-UPF0118 (Lanes 1, 3, 5) and KNabc/pET-22b (Lanes 2, 4, 6) were sampled, respectively, and then used for SDS-PAGE (A) and western blots (B). The position of target protein UPF0118 fused with a N-terminal His6 tag is shown with a solid arrow.

Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity in everted membrane vesicles

Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity with everted membrane vesicles prepared from cells of E. coli KNabc strains carrying pUC-UPF0118 or pUC18 was determined by measuring the dequenching of acridine orange fluorescence upon addition of NaCl or LiCl. As shown in Fig. 6, both Na+/H+ and Li+/H+ antiport activity were detected in everted membrane vesicles from KNabc/pUC-UPF0118, while no Na+/H+ or Li+/H+ antiport activity was detected in those from KNabc/pUC18. The effect of pH on Na+/H+ as well as Li+/H+ antiport activity was also measured. UPF0118 exhibited Na+/H+ or Li+/H+ antiport activity at a wide range of pH between 7.5 and 9.5, with the highest Na+/H+ and Li+/H+ antiport activity at pH 9.0 (Fig. 7). Also, K+/H+ antiport activity was measured in everted membrane vesicles from KNabc/pUC-UPF0118, but no activity was detected.

Figure 6. Assays for the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity in the everted membranes.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The activity measurements for Na+/H+ antiporter (A), Li+/H+ antiporter (B) were performed at pH 9.0 in everted membrane vesicles prepared from cells of E. coli KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 (to the left) or KNabc/pUC18 (to the right) by the French pressure cell method. At the time points indicated by downward arrows, Tris-D-lactic acid (final concentration 10 mM) was added to the assay mixture to initiate fluorescence quenching. At the time points indicated by upward arrows, NaCl (final concentration 10 mM) or LiCl (final concentration 10 mM) was added to the assay mixture. Fluorescence quenching is shown in arbitrary units.

Figure 7. pH-dependent profile of the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity of UPF0118.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

The antiporter activity was measured by the fluorescence quenching method. Na+/H+ antiport activity (filled circle) and Li+/H+ antiport activity (filled square) were measured at the indicated pH adjusted by 10 mM BTP buffer. The wavelength of excitation light was 492 nm and fluorescence was monitored at 526 nm. Each value point represents the average of three independent determinations.

In order to assess the affinity and maximal velocity of UPF0118 for Na+ or Li+, Michaelis-Menten kinetics of UPF0118 for Na+ and Li+ were analyzed, respectively, by measuring Na+/H+ and Li+/H+ antiport activity in everted membrane vesicles from KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 at pH 9.0 with final concentrations of added NaCl or LiCl varying from 0–15 mM. The apparent Km and Vmax values of UPF0118 for Na+ and Li+ were finally calculated to be 1.13 ± 0.09 mM/23.08 ± 0.48 mM (Fig. 8A) and 1.50 ± 0.20 mM/18.66 ± 0.69 mM (Fig. 8B), respectively. This suggests that Na+ is a better substrate than Li+ for the antiporter.

Figure 8. Michaelis-Menten kinetics and calculation of the apparent Km and Vmax values of UPF0118.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Na+/H+ (A) and Li+/H+ (B) antiport activity of UPF0118 were plotted as the respective function of cation concentrations. For the calculation of the apparent Km and Vmax values of UPF0118, non-linear regression analysis was carried out and the corresponding apparent Km and Vmax values were obtained with Prism 5.0, respectively. Each value point represents the average of three independent determinations.

Discussion

In this study, we showed a protein with uncharacterized function, UPF0118, from the moderate halophile NEAU-ST10-40T exhibits Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, whose homologs have not been annotated in their genomes as yet. Based on the protein identity and phylogenetic analysis, UPF0118 should represent a novel class of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter, which is significantly different from all known single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 or single-gene proteins with the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity32,33,34,35,42. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the functional analysis of a protein with uncharacterized function as a representative of UPF0118 family.

UPF0118 was predicted to contain six putative transmembrane segments (Fig. 2), which was confirmed by the result that UPF0118 was mainly localized in the membrane protein fractions from E. coli KNabc/pET-22b-UPF0118 (Fig. 5). However, a weak signal was also detected in the cytoplasmic protein fractions from E. coli KNabc/pET-22b-UPF0118 (Fig. 5). We speculated that the membrane protein fractions could not be absolutely separated from the cytoplasmic protein ones by ultracentrifugation, which may lead to a trace amount of the former remaining in the latter. Combined with hydrophobic analysis of UPF0118, UPF0118 is a transmembrane protein of low polarity, which is consistent with the reports on Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters1,2,3,4. UPF0118 could confer the E. coli KNabc the salt tolerance of 0.3 M NaCl and 30 mM LiCl, and the capability of growing under alkaline conditions (Fig. 4). The pH-dependent Na+/H+ and Li+/H+ antiport activity was detected in everted membrane vesicles from KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 at a wide pH range from 7.5 to 9.5, with the highest Na+/H+ antiport and Li+/H+ antiport activity at pH 9.0 (Fig. 7), but not from KNabc/pUC18 (Fig. 6). Therefore, UPF0118 is likely to encode a pH-dependent Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter, which is consistent with the reports on Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters1,2,3,4,8. Also, UPF0118 exhibited Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity mainly under alkaline conditions from pH 8.0 to 9.5 (Fig. 7), which may be related to the adaptation of its host to the extremophilic saline-alkaline conditions, since strain NEAU-ST10–40T is a moderate halophile with the optimum growth at the 8% (w/v) NaCl concentrations and at pH 8.039.

A careful protein alignment using BLASTp at the NCBI website43 revealed that UPF0118 shares no identity with all representatives of known specific single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and single-gene proteins with the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, even putative Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters. This is confirmed with the phylogenetic analysis of selected homologs of UPF0118 at a wide range of 22–82% identities, together with all known specific single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and single-gene proteins with the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity (Fig. 3). Therefore, we propose that UPF0118 should represent a novel class of Na+/H+ antiporter.

UPF0118 family proteins are one category of predicted transmembrane proteins with uncharacterized protein function containing a conserved domain of unknown function (designated DUF20, a protein sequence homologous to the one corresponding to UPF0118 from No. 10 residue to No. 346 residue containing six TMSs)44. Based on the protein alignment between UPF01118 and its ten closest homologs, five highly conserved motifs, especially “LLAIRRTVEPKVMGRHIGLSPLATLIAM”, were found among the selected homologs at a wide range of 58–82% identities. Even though the homologs of UPF0118 were broaden to a wider range of 30–82% identities, this motif is also relatively conserved with the exception of several residues. In the future study, we plan to delete this motif, or each of other four ones, or replace the conserved acidic or polar residues in the domain of unknown function, DUF20, to identify whether they are involved in the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. Since UPF0118 and its selected homologs clustered with the bootstrap value of 92%, we propose that the function of UPF0118 should represent those of this family proteins. As shown at the website https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, no information suggested the exact function of UPF0118 family proteins with the domain of unknown function, DUF20. In this study, we at least showed that UPF0118 exhibits Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, which is the first report on the functional analysis of a protein with uncharacterized protein function as a representative of UPF0118. The results presented in this manuscript triggers the understanding of the function of UPF0118 family proteins containing the domain of unknown function, DUF20.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

H. andaensis NEAU-ST10-40T was grown in 8% (w/v, optimum) NaCl modified S-G liquid medium at pH 8.0 (optimum) with the following composition: 1.0% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% casein, 0.2% KCl, 0.3% sodium citrate, 2.0% MgSO4 · 7H2O, 8.0% NaCl, as described by Wang et al.39. E. coli strain KNabc, lacking three major Na+/H+ antiporters (NhaA, NhaB and ChaA)6 and its transformant cells carrying either the empty vector pUC18, pET-22b, or the recombinant plasmids pUC-DP61 (pUC18 carrying a 4.4-kb DNA fragment with Na+/H+ antiport activity), pUC-UPF0118 (pUC18 carrying UPF0118 only) or pET-22b-UPF0118 (pET-22b carrying UPF0118 fused with an N-terminal His6 tag) were grown in the LBK medium consisting of 1.0% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 87 mM KCl as described by Karpel et al.5. For the salt tolerance test, 1% overnight cultures of KNabc transformant cells grown at 37 °C in the LBK medium at pH 7.0 were innoculated into fresh LBK medium at pH 7.0, to which NaCl or LiCl was added at indicated concentrations, followed by incubation at 37 °C. To test the effect of pH on cell growth, the KNabc transformant cells grown at 37 °C in the LBK medium at pH 7.0 were innoculated into fresh LBK medium containing 50 mM NaCl at indicated pHs adjusted by adding the Hepes-Tris buffer to a final concentration of 100 mM, followed by incubation at 37 °C. It should be pointed out that Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters can offer alkaline pH resistance only in the presence of Na+ or Li+. Therefore, a certain amount of Na+ such as 50 mM NaCl needs be added to the tested medium1,2,3,4. The above mentioned cell growth was ended after 24 h and monitored turbidimetrically at 600 nm. For the more detailed analysis of the resistance of UPF0118 to NaCl, LiCl and pH, 1% overnight cultures of KNabc cells carrying the empty vector pUC18 or pUC-UPF0118 grown at 37 °C in the LBK medium at pH 7.0 were innoculated into fresh LBK medium at pH 7.0, to which 0. 2 M NaCl or 5 mM LiCl was added, or fresh LBK medium containing 50 mM NaCl at pH 7.5 adjusted by adding the Hepes-Tris buffer at the final concentration of 100 mM, followed by incubation at 37 °C. Also, to show cell growth in the absence of the salts at neutral pH, the KNabc transformant cells carrying the empty vector pUC18 or pUC-UPF0118 grown at 37 °C in the LBK medium at pH 7.0 were innoculated into fresh LBK medium without the addition of the tested salts at pH 7.0 adjusted by adding the Hepes-Tris buffer at the final concentration of 100 mM, followed by incubation at 37 °C. The above mentioned cell growth was monitored turbidimetrically at 600 nm at the indicated time points within 28 h. The growth cuvres were plotted on a semilogarithmic scale. Ampicillin was added to a final concentration of 50 μg · ml−1 for the selection and growth of cells containing plasmids. Eletrocompetent E. coli cells were prepared and electroporated according to the protocol described in our previous study38.

Screening of the DNA fragment containing Na+/H+ antiporter gene and subcloning of UPF0118

The genomic DNA was extracted from strain NEAU-ST10-40T, and partially digested with Sau3AI. The DNA fragments with 4–10 kb were separated by agarose electrophoresis and ligated into pUC18, which had been digested with BamHI and dephosphorylated with bacterial alkaline phosphatase, using T4 DNA ligase. Electrocompetent cells of E. coli KNabc were transformed with the ligated reaction mixture and spread on LBK plates containing 0.2 M NaCl, 1.5% agar and 50 μg·ml−1 of ampicillin. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and colonies picked for further studies. For the identification of the exact ORF with Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, UPF0118 was subcloned, together with its promoter-like and SD sequences, into SalI- and EcoRI-digested pUC18 through digestion by the same two restriction enzymes and ligation (Fig. 1). Also, subcloning strategy of ORF2 or ORF4 was similar to that of UPF0118. For the detection and localization of UPF0118, the sole ORF of upf0118 gene was fused in frame with an N-terminal His6 tag followed by a thrombin proteolytic cleavage site and a T7 tag in an expression vector pET-28b (Novagen Co. Ltd) through PCR amplification, restriction enzyme digestion and ligation. The forward primer is 5′-GGATCCGATGTTCCGCTACCTTTCG-3′ (BamHI underlined) and the reverse primer is 5′-CTCGAGTTATAATTTAAAGTTCCAG-3′ (XhoI underlined). Because E. coli KNabc and vector pET-28b carry kanamycin resistance as a selection indicator, the resultant plasmid designated pET28b-UPF0118, which can’t be used for the complementation with E. coli KNabc, was double-digested by using BglII and XhoI, and then the smaller band was separated by agarose electrophoresis and ligated into an expression vector pET-22b (Novagen Co. Ltd), with an ampcillin resistance as a selection indicator. The resultant expression construct designated pET-22b-UPF0118 was verified by sequencing analysis.

Preparation of everted membrane vesicles

For the assay of Na+/H+ antiport activity, E. coli KNabc cells carrying KNabc/pUC-UPF0118 or the empty vector pUC18 (as a negative control) were grown in LBK medium up to the mid-exponential phase and harvested by centrifugation at 5000 g, 4 °C for 10 min. Everted membrane vesicles were prepared by French pressure cell method at 2000 psi and collected by ultracentrifugation at 100, 000 g for 1 h as described by Rosen45. The vesicles were resuspended in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 140 mM choline chloride, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol and 250 mM sucrose, and stored at −80 °C before use.

Detection and localization of UPF0118 by western blot

For the detection and localization of UPF0118, E. coli KNabc carrying pET-22b-UPF0118 and the empty vector pET-22b (as a negative control) were grown in LBK medium to OD600 between 0.4 and 0.6 at 37 °C, followed by induction by the addition of isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside to a final concentration of 1 mM at 28 °C for an additional 6 h and then harvested by centrifugation at 5, 000 g, 4 °C for 10 min and washed three times with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). Cell pellets were frozen at −80 °C overnight to weaken the cell wall and resuspended in an ice-cold lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl and 0.1% Triton X-100. Cell suspension was lysed in the above mentioned ice-cold lysis buffer plus 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT and 100 μg/ml lysozyme via an JY92-IIN ultrasonic cell mixer (NingBo Scientz Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China) in a pulsed mode (cycles: 4 sec ON followed by 5 sec OFF) until the lysate changed from an opaque solution into a less turbid solution. The lysed sample was centrifuged at 5,000 g at 4 °C for 10 min to remove large debris fragments and unlysed cells. A part of supernatant was sampled as a representative of the total protein extract including membrane and cytoplasmic protein fractions and the remain supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 100, 000 g for 1 h as described by Rosen45 to separate membrane protein fractions (pellets) from cytoplasmic protein ones (supernatant). SDS-PAGE and western blots were performed as described by Green et al.46. His6-tag detection was done using a rabbit anti-6× His-tag antibody (Abcom Ltd, China) and a goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nachuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Changchun, China). The BeyoECL Star kit (Beyotime Biotechnology Co. Ltd, China) was used and antibody binding was visualized by a Tanon-5200 multi chemiluminescence imaging system (Tanon Co. Ltd, China).

Assay of Na+/H+ antiport activity

The Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity of everted membrane vesicles was estimated according to the extent of the collapse of a transmembrane proton gradient, with acridine orange as the pH indicator, as described by Rosen45. The assay mixture contained 10 mM BTP (BisTris-Propane) (at the indicated pH from 6.5 to 9.5), 140 mM choline chloride, 5 mM Mg2SO4, 1 μM acridine orange and membrane vesicles (equivalent of 40 μg ml−1 total protein). Tris-D-lactic acid (final concentration 10 mM) was added to initiate respiration. After the fluorescence quenching reached steady state, NaCl, LiCl or Na-free KCl with high purity (99.9995%, Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC.) (To avoid the contamination of traces of NaCl) was added to the final concentration of 10 mM and then the fluorescence was dequenched. The ratio of fluorescence dequenching extent by NaCl or LiCl to the fluorescence quenching one by Tris-D-lactic acid was recorded as a representative of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. Fluorescence was monitored with a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) at excitation and emission wavelength of 492 and 526 nm, respectively.

The plotting of Michaelis-Menten kinetics of UPF0118 and calculation of the apparent K m and V max values

For the plotting of Michaelis-Menten kinetics of UPF0118, pH was adjusted to 9.0 based on the highest Na+/H+ and Li+/H+ antiport activity, and the different Na+ or Li+ concentrations were varied from 0 to 15 mM. Fluorescence dequenching percentages at the corresponding cation concentrations were recorded as their respective representatives of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity. The Michaelis-Menten kinetics of UPF0118 was plotted with Na+/H+ and Li+/H+ antiport activity as the respective function of cation concentrations. For the calculation of the apparent Km and Vmax values of UPF0118, non-linear regression analysis was carried out and the corresponding apparent Km and Vmax values were obtained with Prism 5.0.

DNA manipulation and sequence analysis

Preparation of plasmid DNA, extraction of genomic DNA, restriction enzyme digestion and ligation were carried out as described by Green et al.46. DNA sequencing was performed by Beijing Genomics Institute (Beijing, China). The analyses for ORF and hydrophobicity were carried out with the DNAMAN 6.0 software. Protein sequence alignment was performed through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the website http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blastp43. A phylogenetic tree including UPF0118 and its homologs, together with all known specific single-gene Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporters and single-gene proteins with the Na+(Li+)/H+ antiport activity, was constructed by using the neighbour-joining method47. The stability of clusters was ascertained by performing a bootstrap analysis (1000 replications). Promoter prediction was performed using the website http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/promoter.html. Transmembrane segment prediction was carried out by using the website http://mobyle.pasteur.fr/cgi-bin/portal.py?#forms::toppred 48.

Protein content determination

Protein concentration in everted membrane vesicles was determined by the method of Lowry et al.49 with bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

The nucleotide sequence of UPF0118 reported in this paper has been submitted to GenBank database with the accession number KY231907.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Dong, P. et al. A UPF0118 family protein with uncharacterized function from the moderate halophile Halobacillus andaensis represents a novel class of Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter. Sci. Rep. 7, 45936; doi: 10.1038/srep45936 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material
srep45936-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Terry A. Krulwich (Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York) for friendly donation of E. coli strain KNabc. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31570045) and Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. C201417).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions The experimental set-up was designed by J.J. and P.D.; the experiments were conducted by P.D., L.W., N.S., L.Y., J.C., M.Y., H.C., R.Z., J.L., and H.A.; the experiments for the growth curves and western blot were supplemented by P.D., L.W., and N.S.; data analysis was performed by J.J., P.D., L.W., N.S., and L.Y.; The results of the experiments were interpreted by P.D., L.W., N.S., L.Y., J.C., M.Y., H.C., R.Z., J.L., and H.A., and discussed by all authors; the manuscript was drafted by P.D., L.W., N.S., and H. A., and then revised by J.J. and P.D.; The final version was approved by all authors.

References

  1. Padan E. & Schuldiner S. Molecular physiology of Na+/H+ antiporters, key transporters in circulation of Na+ and H+ in cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1185, 129–151 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ito M., Guffanti A. A., Oudega B. & Krulwich T. A. mrp, a multigene, multifunctional locus in Bacillus subtilis with roles in resistance to cholate and to Na+ and in pH homeostasis. J. Bacteriol. 181, 2394–2402 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Padan E., Bibi E., Ito M. & Krulwich T. A. Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: new insights. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 177, 67–88 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Quinn M. J. et al. NhaP1 is a K+(Na+)/H+ antiporter required for growth and internal pH homeostasis of Vibrio cholerae at low extracellular pH. Microbiology 158, 1094–1105 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karpel R., Olami Y., Taglicht D., Schuldiner S. & Padan E. Sequencing of the gene ant which affects the Na+/H+ antiporter activity in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 10408–10414 (1988). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nozaki K., Inaba K., Kuroda T., Tsuda M. & Tsuchiya T. Cloning and sequencing of the gene for Na+/H+ antiporter of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 222, 774–779 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Padan E., Venturi M., Gerchman Y. & Dover N. Na+/H+ antiporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1505, 144–157 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herz K., Vimont S., Padan E. & Berche P. Roles of NhaA, NhaB, and NhaD Na+/H+ antiporters in survival of Vibrio cholerae in a saline environment. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1236–1244 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pinner E., Padan E. & Schuldiner S. Cloning, sequencing and expression of the nhaB gene, encoding a Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11064–11068 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nakamura T., Enomoto H. & Unemoto T. Cloning and sequencing of the nhaB gene encoding an Na+/H+ antiporter from Vibrio alginolyticus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1275, 157–160 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ito M., Guffanti A. A., Aemsky J., Mackivey D. & Krulwich T. A. Role of the nhaC-encoded Na+/H+ antiporter of alkaliphilic Bacillus firmus OF4. J. Bacteriol. 63, 3851–3857 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nozaki K., Kuroda T., Mizushima T. & Tsuchiya T. A new Na+/H+ antiporter, NhaD, of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1369, 213–220 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu J. et al. The activity profile of the NhaD-Type Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter from the soda lake haloalkaliphile Alkalimonas amylolytica is adaptive for the extreme environment. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7589–7595 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kurz M., Brünig A. N. S. & Galinski E. A. NhaD type sodium/proton-antiporter of Halomonas enlongata: a salt stress response mechanism in marine habitats? Saline Syst. 2, 10 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang H. et al. Cloning and identification of a novel NhaD-type Na+/H+ antiporter from metagenomic DNA of the halophilic bacteria in soil samples around Daban Salt Lake. Extremophiles 18, 89–98 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cui Y. et al. Expression and functional analysis of two NhaD type antiporters from the halotolerant and alkaliphilic Halomonas sp. Y2. Extremophiles 20, 631–639 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sousa P. M. et al. The novel NhaE-type Na(+)/H(+) antiporter of the pathogenic bacterium Neisseria meningitidis. Arch. Microbiol. 195, 211–217 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Waser M., Hess B. D., Davies K. & Solioz M. Cloning and disruption of a putative Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Enterococcus hirae. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5396–5400 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Utsugi J., Inaba K., Kuroda T., Tsuda M. & Tsuchiya T. Cloning and sequencing of a novel Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1398, 330–334 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gouda T. et al. nhaG Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Bacillus subtilis ATCC, which is missing in the complete genome sequence of strain, and properties of the antiporter. J. Biochem. 130, 711–717 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang L. et al. A Na+/H+ antiporter gene of the moderately halophilic bacterium Halobacillus dabanensis D-8T: cloning and molecular characterization. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 255, 89–95 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saier M. H. et al. Phylogenetic characterization of novel transport protein families revealed by genome analyses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1422, 1–56 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamamoto T. et al. Characterization of a gene responsible for the Na+/H+ antiporter system of alkalophilic Bacillus species strain C-125. Mol. Microbiol. 14, 939–946 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dziobawinogrodzki J., Winogrodzki O., Krulwich T. A., Boin M. A. & Dibrov P. The Vibrio cholerae Mrp system: cation/proton antiport properties and enhancement of bile salt resistance in a heterologous host. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechol. 16, 176–186 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Meng L. et al. Cloning and identification of Group 1 mrp operon encoding a novel monovalent cation/proton antiporter system from the moderate halophile Halomonas zhaodongensis. Extremophiles 18, 963–972 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hiramatsu T., Kodama K., Kuroda T., Mizushima T. & Tsuchiya T. A putative multisubunit Na+/H+ antiporter from Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 180, 6642–6648 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Putnoky P. et al. The pha gene cluster of Rhizobium meliloti involved in pH adaptation and symbiosis encodes a novel type of K+ efflux system. Mol. Microbiol. 28, 1091–1101 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang J. et al. Salt-tolerance genes involved in cation efflux and osmoregulation of Sinorhizobium fredii RT19 detected by isolation and characterization of Tn5 mutants. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 239, 139–146 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang L. et al. The pha2 gene cluster involved in Na+ resistance and adaption to alkaline pH in Sinorhizobium fredii RT19 encodes a monovalent cation/proton antiporter. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 262, 172–177 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yamaguchi T., Tsutsumi F., Putnoky P., Fukuhara M. & Nakamura T. pH-dependent regulation of the multi-subunit cation/proton antiporter Pha1 system from Sinorhizobium meliloti. Microbiology 155, 2750–2756 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kosono S., Morotomi S., Kitada M. & Kudo T. Analyses of a Bacillus subtilis homologue of the Na+/H+ antiporter gene which is important for pH homeostasis of alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. C-125. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1409, 171–175 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Radchenko M. V. et al. Potassium/proton antiport system of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 19822–19829 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei Y., Guffanti A. A., Ito M. & Krulwich T. A. Bacillus subtilis YqkI is a novel malic/Na+-lactate antiporter that enhances growth on malate at low protonmotive force. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30287–30292 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cheng J., Guffanti A. A. & Krulwich T. A. The chromosomal tetracycline resistance locus of Bacillus subtilis encodes a Na+/H+ antiporter that is physiologically important at elevated pH. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27365–27371 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang L. et al. A primary sodium pump gene of the moderate halophile Halobacillus dabanensis exhibits secondary antiporter properties. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 346, 612–617 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Edgar R. & Bibi E. MdfA, an Escherichia coli multidrug resistance protein with an extraordinarily broad spectrum of drug recognition. J. Bacteriol. 179, 2274–2280 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lewinson O., Padan E. & Bibi E. Alkalitolerance: a biological function for a multidrug transporter in pH homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14073–14078 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jiang J. et al. Putative paired small multidrug resistance family proteins PsmrAB, the homolog of YvdSR, actually function as a novel two-component Na+/H+ antiporter. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 338, 31–38 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang K. et al. Halobacillus andaensis sp. nov. a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from saline and alkaline soil. Int. J. Sys. Evol. Microbiol. 65, 1908–1914 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ventosa A., Nieto J. J. & Oren A. Biology of moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Bio. Rev. 62, 504–544 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Oren A. Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 334–348 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ivey M. D. et al. Cloning and Characterization of a putative Ca2+/H+ antiporter gene from Escherichia coli upon functional complementation of Na+/H+ antiporter-deficient strains by the overexpressed gene. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11296–11303 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W. & Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Marchler-Bauer A. et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 222–226 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosen B. P. Ion extrusion system in Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 125, 328–336 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Green M. R. & Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual4th ed. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  47. Saitou N. & Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Claros M. G. & von Heijne G. TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10, 685–686 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L. & Randall R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 (1951). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material
srep45936-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES