Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 4;10:23. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0316-5

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of progression-free survival

Variables Univariate P Multivariatea P
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Multiparous Yes 0.32 0.15–0.67 0.024
Nulliparous No 1
Diameter ≥10 0.26 0.09–0.70 0.0076
<10 1
Histology Serous 1
Mucinous 0.41 0.18–0.95 0.0375
Endometrioid 0.64 0.19–2.19 0.4808
Micropapillary Yes 3.88 1.76–8.52 0.0008
No 1
Stage II & III 2.55 1.10–5.91 0.0295
I 1
Fertility preserving surgery
 USO 1.6 0.59–4.33 0.3553 1.26 0.37–4.08 0.7395
 USO + CC 5.74 2.10–15.67 0.0007 2.72 0.65–11.38 0.1719
 BC 5.89 2.25–14.42 0.0003 3.95 1.22–12.85 0.0223
Radical surgery 1
Invasive implant Yes 4.87 1.67–14.20 0.0038 10.38 2.21–48.69 0.0030
No 1
Lymphadenectomy Yes 0.44 0.21–0.94 0.0328 0.26 0.09–0.75 0.0129
No 1
Pelvic lymph node metastasis Yes 4.34 1.21–15.67 0.0246
No 1
Para-aortic lymph node metastasis Yes 17.34 1.80–167.50 0.0137
No 1
Chemotherapy Yes 2.72 1.20–6.19 0.0164
No
Restaging Yes 9.8 3.96–23.78 <0.0001
No

USO unilateral salpingo-oophorectom, USO + CC unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy plus contralateral cystectomy, BC bilateral cystectomy

aMultivariate model was built after controlling for tumor histology and stage