Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;149(4):483–510. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611683

Table 2. Comparison of mean biophysical and permeability parameters of in vitro expressed Cav3 channels (±SE; n values in parentheses).

Parameter TCav3 LCav3 (+8b-25c) P-value Ref. Cav3.1 P-value Ref. Cav3.2 P-value Ref. Cav3.3 P-value Ref.
Activation
Peak of IV (mV) −45 −40 1 −35 2 −35 2 25 2
V1/2 −59.32 ± 0.9 (8) −53.48 ± 0.34 (13) *** 1 −49.3 ± 0.7 (26) *** 2 −48.4 ± 1.2 (10) *** 2 41.5 ± 1.1 (17) *** 2
Slope (k, mV) 4.50 ± 0.25 (8) 5.46 ± 0.14 (13) ** 1 4.6 ± 0.1 (26) NS 2 5.2 ± 0.4 (10) NS 2 6.2 ± 0.2 (17) *** 2
Inactivation
V1/2 −74.15 ± 0.90 (10) −70.89 ± 0.49 (16) ** 1 −74.2 ± 1.1 (8) NS 2 −75.6 ± 0.7 (19) NS 2 69.8 ± 0.9 (17) ** 2
Slope (k, mV) 2.69 ± 0.11 (8) 2.93 ± 0.08 (16) NS 1 5.5 ± 0.3 (8) *** 2 6.2 ± 0.2 (19) *** 2 6.1 ± 0.1 (17) *** 2
Activation kinetics
τ (−50 mV) 14.36 ± 0.31 (8) 3.26 ± 0.13 (16) *** 1 8.2 ± 0.9 (8) *** 3 9.9 ± 0.4 (10) *** 3 43 ± 3 (9) *** 3
τ (−10 mV) 3.48 ± 0.13 (8) 0.74 ± 0.03 (16) *** 1 1.1 ± 0.1 (8) *** 3 1.8 ± 0.1 (10) *** 3 5.9 ± 0.5 (9) *** 3
Fold change 4.1 4.4 7.5 5.5 7.3
Inactivation kinetics
τ (−50 mV) 66.33 ± 3.39 (6) 27.51 ± 1.34 (16) *** 1 62 ± 23 (8) NS 3 28 ± 3 (10) *** 3 126 ± 22 (9) * 3
τ (−10 mV) 51.36 ± 1.53 (6) 15.67 ± 0.56 (16) *** 1 16 ± 1 (8) *** 3 15 ± 1 (10) *** 3 80 ± 5 (9) *** 3
Fold change 1.3 1.8 3.9 1.9 1.6
Deactivation
−100 mV 1.46 ± 0.06 (12) 1.37 ± 0.05 (19) NS 1 2.6 ± 0.2 (9) *** 2 3.6 ± 0.4 (14) *** 2 1.12 ± 0.1 (31) * 2
−70 mV 9.15 ± 0.66 (12) 2.28 ± 0.18 (19) *** 1 6.2 ± 0.4 (9) ** 2 8.5 ± 1.1 (14) NS 2 2.1 ± 0.1 (30) *** 2
Recovery
τ recovery (ms) 1275.05 ± 54.43 (6) 908.04 ± 27.05 (14) *** 1 137 ± 5 (12) *** 2 448 ± 36 (7) *** 2 260 ± 30 (18) *** 2
Nickel
(IC50 µM) 335.0 ± 6.5 (9) 300.0 ± 29.2 (4) NS 4 304.8 ± 6.2 (5–6) * 5 4.9 ± 2.0 (5–6) *** 5 216 ± 9 (5-6) *** 5
Mixed Ca2+/Na+ currents
% increase in Imax (Ca2+) 42.09 ± 3.19 (8) 12a: 1439.75 ± 82.50 (6) *** 6 26.64 ± 9.24 (4) * 31.96 ± 4.58 (11) NS 45.45 ± 7.59 (6) NS
12b: 153.02 ± 9.61 (7) *** 6
% increase in Imax (Ba2+) 51.19 ± 2.64 (4) 12a: 901.29 ± 120.33 (5) *** 6 27.01 ± 3.17 (9) *** 6 36.88 ± 3.50 (7) * 6 49.91 ± 6.23 (4) NS 6
12b: 121.07 ± 4.26 (3) *** 6
Ca2+ vs. X+ permeability
pCa/pLi 19.87 ± 1.30 (8) 12a: 22.74 ± 0.41 (8) * 6 46.67 ± 2.32 (7) *** 6
12b: 27.40 ± 1.13 (7) *** 6
pCa/pNa 35.61 ± 1.52 (8) 12a: 33.06 ± 1.50 (6) NS 6 89.56 ± 8.21 (6) *** 6 80.58 ± 3.69 (4) *** 56.19 ± 2.99 (7) ***
12b: 41.49 ± 1.98 (8) * 6
pCa/pK 63.99 ± 4.19 (9) 12a: 50.25 ± 1.56 (12) ** 6 140.16 ± 12.02 (5) *** 6
12b: 78.93 ± 4.17 (11) * 6
pCa/pCs 114.83 ± 10.64 (7) 12a: 111.30 ± 8.57 (10) NS 6 154.65 ± 7.99 (5) * 6
12b: 113.76 ± 7.19 (11) NS 6

P-values for statistical comparisons for all channels with respect to TCav3 were generated using one-way ANOVA. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0005; NS, not significantly different. Bold indicates the value most similar to TCav3, and bold italics indicates the value most different from TCav3. References: 1, Senatore and Spafford (2012); 2, Chemin et al. (2002); 3, Gomora et al. (2002); 4, Senatore and Spafford (2010); 5, Kang et al. (2006); 6, Senatore et al. (2014).