Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 4;12(4):e0174948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174948

Table 2. Coverage of control interventions by region.

Region Number of Clusters Prevalence pro_1ITNa pro_1ITN4twob pro_slept5itnc IRSd ACTe pro_itnaccessf pro_sleptitng
North East 32 32.3 0.96 0.51 0.86 0.02 0.71 0.80 0.84
West Nile 16 27.4 0.96 0.64 0.76 0.02 0.65 0.86 0.79
Mid-North 31 14.8 0.94 0.54 0.77 0.55 0.71. 0.82 0.77
Mid-Western 14 14.1 0.96 0.52 0.83 0.0 0.64 0.81 0.80
Mid-Eastern 24 14.1 0.97 0.52 0.81 0.0 0.79 0.82 0.76
East Central 15 38.6 0.86 0.36 0.69 0.0 0.72 0.67 0.66
Central 2 17 20.4 0.89 0.46 0.66 0.0 0.72 0.73 0.66
Central 1 17 11.2 0.87 0.51 0.65 0.02. 0.60 0.74 0.62
South Western 11 4.5 1.00 0.69 0.66 0.0 0.60 0.91 0.67
Kampala 16 0.0 0.94 0.62 0.71 0.03 0.57 0.82 0.77
Overall 193 19.5 0.94 0.54 0.76 0.1 0.68 0.81 0.75

aProportion of households with at least one ITN

bProportion of households with at least one ITN for every two people

cProportion of children less than 5 years who slept under an ITN

dProportion of households sprayed in the last 6 months

eProportion of fevers treated with any ACTs

fProportion of population who had access to an ITN

gProportion of population who slept under an ITN